ILCS » Chapter 410 · Act 39
Illinois Compiled Statutes

410 ILCS 39/1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(410 ILCS 39/1)
    Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Restroom Access Act.
(Source: P.A. 94-450, eff. 8-4-05.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2016–2019 · leading case: Carmichael v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 2018 IL App (1st) 170075 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Carmichael v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 2018 IL App (1st) 170075 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “(West 2014) ), since the only statutory penalty for violation was a fine not to exceed $100; the court found this penalty inadequate to make compliance likely, stating that "a retail store that refuses to comply with the Act would not even notice the impact of the petty offense…”
Carmichael v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 2018 IL App (1st) 170075 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “, 2017 IL App (1st) 160844 , ¶ 40 (private right of action was necessary to effectuate the purpose of the Restroom Access Act (410 ILCS 39/1 et seq. (West 2014)), since the only statutory penalty for violation was a fine not to exceed $100; the court found this penalty…”
Pilotto v. Urban Outfitters West, L.L.C., 2016 IL App (1st) 160844 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “OPINION ¶1 Plaintiff, Alana Pilotto, brought this civil action against defendant, Anthropologie, a retail store, alleging that she was harmed as a result of defendant’s violation of the Restroom Access Act (Act) (410 ILCS 39/1 et seq. (West 2014)). Plaintiff is appealing the…”
Pilotto v. Urban Outfitters West, L.L.C., 2016 IL App (1st) 160844 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “OPINION ¶1 Plaintiff, Alana Pilotto, brought this civil action against defendant, Anthropologie, a retail store, alleging that she was harmed as a result of defendant’s violation of the Restroom Access Act (Act) (410 ILCS 39/1 et seq. (West 2014)). Plaintiff is appealing the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.