ILCS » Chapter 425 · Act 30
Illinois Compiled Statutes

425 ILCS 30/1 (2026)

This Act may be cited as the Fireworks Regulation Act of Illinois

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(425 ILCS 30/1) (from Ch. 127 1/2, par. 101)
    Sec. 1. This Act may be cited as the Fireworks Regulation Act of Illinois.
(Source: P.A. 86-1475.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1998–2001 · leading case: Cadena v. Chicago Fireworks Mfg. Co., 697 N.E.2d 802 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cadena v. Chicago Fireworks Mfg. Co., 697 N.E.2d 802 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs also merely stated at oral argument that the Fireworks Regulation Act of Illinois (425 ILCS 30/1 et seq. ( West 1992 )) and the Fireworks Use Act (425 ILCS 35/1 et seq.”
Chicago Fire Fighters Union Local No. 2 v. City of Chicago, 751 N.E.2d 1169 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “(West 1998)), designed for the prevention and suppression of forest fires and which also incorporates criminal penalties for violation thereof; and acts regulating fireworks (425 ILCS 30/1 et seq., 35/0.01 et seq. (West 1998)), furniture fire safety (425 ILCS 45/1001 et seq.”
Chicago Fire Fighters Union Local No. 2 v. City of Chicago, 735 N.E.2d 108 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “(West 1998)), designed for the prevention and suppression of forest fires and which also incorporates criminal penalties for violation thereof; and acts regulating fireworks (425 ILCS 30/1 et seq., 35/0.01 et seq. (West 1998)), furniture fire safety (425 ILCS 45/1001 et seq.”
Cadena v. Chicago Fireworks Mfg. Co. (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs also merely stated at oral argument that the "Fireworks Display Use and Sale Acts" (425 ILCS 30/1 et seq ., 35/1 et seq .) were the statutes the City was required to follow "before any fireworks display can be done," without directing this court to any specific…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.