Illinois Compiled Statutes
430 ILCS 65/15b (2026)
Certified abstracts
✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(430 ILCS 65/15b)
Sec. 15b. Certified abstracts. Any certified abstract issued by the
Director of the Illinois State
Police or transmitted electronically by the Director of the Illinois State Police under this
Section to a
court or on request of a law enforcement agency for the record of a named
person as to
the status of the person's Firearm Owner's Identification Card is prima facie
evidence of
the facts stated in the certified abstract and if the name appearing in the
abstract is the
same as that of a person named in an information or warrant, the abstract is
prima facie
evidence that the person named in the information or warrant is the same person
as the
person named in the abstract and is admissible for any prosecution under this
Act or any
other applicable violation of law and may be admitted as proof of any prior
conviction or proof of records, notices, or orders recorded on individual
Firearm Owner's Identification Card records maintained by the Illinois State Police.
(Source: P.A. 102-538, eff. 8-20-21.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2017–2018 · leading case: People v. Cox, 2017 IL App (1st) 151536, 89 N.E.3d 898.
People v. Cox, 2017 IL App (1st) 151536, 89 N.E.3d 898. “uest of a law enforcement agency for the record of a named person as to the status of the person's Firearm Owner's Identification Card is prima facie evidence of the facts stated in the certified abstract and if the name appearing in the abstract is the same as that of a person…”
People v. Cox, 2017 IL App (1st) 151536. “of the facts stated in the certified abstract and if the name appearing in the abstract is the same as that of a person named in an information or warrant, the abstract is prima facie evidence that the person named in the information or warrant is the same person as the person…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|