ILCS » Chapter 5 · Act 312
Illinois Compiled Statutes

5 ILCS 312/7-102 (2026)

Liability of Employer of Notary

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(5 ILCS 312/7-102) (from Ch. 102, par. 207-102)
    Sec. 7-102. Liability of Employer of Notary. The employer of a notary public is also liable to the persons involved for all damages caused by the notary's official misconduct, if:
        (a) the notary public was acting within the scope of
    
the notary's employment at the time the notary engaged in the official misconduct; and
        (b) the employer consented to the notary public's
    
official misconduct.
(Source: P.A. 84-322.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: Vancura v. Katris, 907 N.E.2d 814 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Vancura v. Katris, 907 N.E.2d 814 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2009). · cites it 9× “Kinko's [1] seeks reversal, contending the court misconstrued section 7-102 of the Illinois Notary Public Act (5 ILCS 312/7-102 (West 1996)) (Act) regarding employer liability and further erred by imposing liability under the common law for negligent training and supervision.”
5 ILCS 312/7-102(a): 1 case
Vancura v. Katris, 907 N.E.2d 814 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2009). “Kinko's [1] seeks reversal, contending the court misconstrued section 7-102 of the Illinois Notary Public Act (5 ILCS 312/7-102 (West 1996)) (Act) regarding employer liability and further erred by imposing liability under the common law for negligent training and supervision.”
5 ILCS 312/7-102(b): 1 case
Vancura v. Katris, 907 N.E.2d 814 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 2009). “Kinko's [1] seeks reversal, contending the court misconstrued section 7-102 of the Illinois Notary Public Act (5 ILCS 312/7-102 (West 1996)) (Act) regarding employer liability and further erred by imposing liability under the common law for negligent training and supervision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.