ILCS » Chapter 50 · Act 725
Illinois Compiled Statutes

50 ILCS 725/3.2 (2026)

No officer shall be subjected to interrogation without first being informed in writing of the nature of the investigation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(50 ILCS 725/3.2) (from Ch. 85, par. 2555)
    Sec. 3.2. No officer shall be subjected to interrogation without first being informed in writing of the nature of the investigation. The information shall be sufficient as to reasonably apprise the officer of the nature of the investigation.
(Source: P.A. 101-652, eff. 7-1-21.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2001–2023 · leading case: State Police v. Fraternal Order of Police Troopers Lodge No. 41, 751 N.E.2d 1261 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Police v. Fraternal Order of Police Troopers Lodge No. 41, 751 N.E.2d 1261 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “2 of the Uniform Peace Officers’ Disciplinary Act (50 ILCS 725/3.2 (West 2000)), again provides certain notice requirements prior to an interrogation of an employee.”
Roman v. Cook Cnty. Sheriff's Merit Bd., 2014 IL App (1st) 123308 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “” 50 ILCS 725/3.2 (West 2008). They also assert the interrogations violated section 3.”
Sherwood v. City of Aurora, 904 N.E.2d 632 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “3 (West 2006)); the subject matter must be disclosed (50 ILCS 725/3.2 (West 2006)); and the officer may have an attorney or union representative available to advise him during the interrogation (50 ILCS 725/3.”
Roman v. Cook Cnty. Sheriff's Merit Bd., 2014 IL App (1st) 123308 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “" 50 ILCS 725/3.2 (West 2008). They also assert the interrogations violated section 3.”
Berge v. Kosman, 2023 IL App (3d) 220059-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). · cites it 2× “2 of the Uniform Peace Officers’ Disciplinary Act (Act) (50 ILCS 725/3.2 (West 2020)) because it failed to identify the specific acts at issue and the specific rules or regulations alleged to have been violated.”
Illinois State Police v. Fraternal Order of Police Troopers Lodge No. 41 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “2 of the Uniform Peace Officers' Disciplinary Act (50 ILCS 725/3.2 (West 2000)), again provides certain notice requirements prior to an interrogation of an employee.”
Sherwood v. City of Aurora (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “3 (West 2006)); the subject matter must be disclosed (50 ILCS 725/3.2 (West 2006)); and the officer may have an attorney or union representative available to advise him during the interrogation (50 ILCS 725/3.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.