Illinois Compiled Statutes
520 ILCS 10/3 (2026)
It is unlawful for any person: (1) to possess, take, transport, sell, offer for sale, give or otherwise dispose of any animal or the product thereof of any animal species which occurs on the Illinois List, unless otherwise authorized by law; (2) to deliver, receive, carry, transport or ship in interstate or foreign commerce plants listed as endangered by the federal government without a permit therefor issued by the Department as provided in Section 4 of this Act; (3) to take plants on the Illinois List without the express written permission of the landowner; or (4) to sell or offer for sale plants or plant products of endangered species on the Illinois List
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(520 ILCS 10/3)
(from Ch. 8, par. 333)
Sec. 3. It is unlawful for any person:
(1) to possess, take, transport, sell, offer for | sale, give or otherwise dispose of any animal or the product thereof of any animal species which occurs on the Illinois List, unless otherwise authorized by law; |
(2) to deliver, receive, carry, transport or ship in | interstate or foreign commerce plants listed as endangered by the federal government without a permit therefor issued by the Department as provided in Section 4 of this Act; |
(3) to take plants on the Illinois List without the | express written permission of the landowner; or |
(4) to sell or offer for sale plants or plant | products of endangered species on the Illinois List. |
(Source: P.A. 102-315, eff. 1-1-22.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1999–1999 · leading case: Glisson v. City of Marion, 720 N.E.2d 1034 (Ill. 1999).
Glisson v. City of Marion, 720 N.E.2d 1034 (Ill. 1999). “Plaintiff claimed that construction of the dam and reservoir violates sections 3 and 11(b) of the Illinois Endangered Species Protection Act (520 ILCS 10/3, 11(b) (West 1998)) because it will destroy the essential habitat of two species listed as threatened and endangered by…”
Glisson v. City of Marion (Ill. 1999). “Plaintiff claimed that construction of the dam and reservoir violates sections 3 and 11(b) of the Illinois Endangered Species Protection Act (520 ILCS 10/3, 11(b) (West 1998)) because it will destroy the essential habitat of two species listed as threatened and endangered by…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|