Illinois Compiled Statutes

55 ILCS 5/3-7006 (2026)

Rules, regulations and procedures; ranks

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(55 ILCS 5/3-7006) (from Ch. 34, par. 3-7006)
    Sec. 3-7006. Rules, regulations and procedures; ranks. Pursuant to recognized merit principles of public employment, the Board shall formulate, adopt, and put into effect rules, regulations and procedures for its operation and the transaction of its business. The Board shall establish a classification of ranks including those positions which shall be exempt from merit classification. The Board shall establish a classification of ranks of the deputy sheriffs in the County Police Department, a classification of all correctional officer employees in the County Department of Corrections, and a classification of all full-time deputy sheriffs not employed as county police officers or county corrections officers and shall set standards and qualifications for each such rank and employee.
    For the purposes of this Division, "full-time" means an average work week of 40 hours throughout the calendar year.
(Source: P.A. 86-962.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Beauchamp v. Dart, 2022 IL App (1st) 210091, 207 N.E.3d 1118.
Beauchamp v. Dart, 2022 IL App (1st) 210091, 207 N.E.3d 1118. “” 55 ILCS 5/3-7006 (West 2018). -6- 1-21-0091 ¶ 15 On appeal, plaintiff argues that the plain language of section 3-9005 of the Counties Code requires that the State’s Attorney prosecute matters before the Merit Board on behalf of the Sheriff because a proceeding before the…”
Beauchamp v. Dart, 2022 IL App (1st) 210091-U. · cites it 2× “¶ 15 The trial court concluded that pursuant to section 3-7006 of the Cook County Sheriff’s Merit Board Act (Merit Board Act) (55 ILCS 5/3-7006 (West 2018))1 and the Board’s Rules and Regulations, “[t]he Sheriff is not required to be represented by counsel [in proceedings before…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.