ILCS » Chapter 55 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

55 ILCS 5/5-1101 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(55 ILCS 5/5-1101) (from Ch. 34, par. 5-1101)
    Sec. 5-1101. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 98-331, eff. 8-13-13. Repealed by P.A. 100-987, eff. 7-1-19.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 167 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2006–2023 · leading case: People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). · cites it 10× “) 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(c)(3) $15* 2nd or more DUI 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d) $100* Drug-Court/Mental-Health Assessment 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d-5) $10* Youth-Diversion/Peer-Court charge 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(e) up to $5* Drug Court 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f) up to $5* Child Advocacy Center charge 55 ILCS…”
People v. Smith, 2014 IL App (4th) 121118 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 8× “" 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d-5) (West 2008). The youth diversion/peer court fee was assessed pursuant to section 5-1101(e), which provides the fee "must be deposited into an account specifically for the operation and administration of a teen court, peer court, peer jury, youth court, or…”
People v. Warren, 2016 IL App (4th) 120721-B (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 3× “" 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f) (West 2010). ¶ 138 In this case, the $5 drug-court assessment imposed by the circuit clerk was a fine, despite its label as a "fee," because the assessment is intended to be used "for the operation and administration of the drug court.”
People v. O'Laughlin, 2012 IL App (4th) 110018 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). · cites it 8× “5), (5) (West 2010); (6) “State’s Atty”–55 ILCS 5/4-2002(a) (West 2010); (7) “Court”–55 ILCS 5/5-1101(c) (West 2010); (8) “Judicial Security”–55 ILCS 5/5-1103 (West 2010); (9) “Youth Diversion”–55 ILCS 5/5-1101(e) (West 2010); (10) “Child Advocacy Fee”–55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f-5)…”
People v. Millsap, 2012 IL App (4th) 110668 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). · cites it 4× “The trial court also ordered defendant to pay various assessments including a Violent Crime Victims Assistance Fund (VCVA) assessment (725 ILCS 240/10(b) (West 2010)) and a Children’s Advocacy Center (CAC) assessment (55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f-5) (West 2010)). ¶2 On appeal, defendant…”
People v. Willis, 950 N.E.2d 265 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). · cites it 7× “Defendant contends that the trial court improperly assessed the DNA analysis fee pursuant to section 5-4-3(j) of the Unified Code of Corrections (730 ILCS 5/5-4-3(j) (West 2008)). He argues that he should *278 not be required to pay for DNA collection, analysis, or storage due…”
People v. Wynn, 2013 IL App (2d) 120575 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 6× “See 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f-5) (West 2010). Thus, it must be imposed.”
People v. Smith, 2013 IL App (2d) 120691 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 4× “Defendant was in custody for 282 days before sentencing and is thus entitled to a credit against any fine under section 110-14(a).”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 8× “Specialty 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d-5) “On a judgment of guilty or grant of supervision.”
People v. Mimes, 953 N.E.2d 55 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). · cites it 4× “The State concedes and we agree that the following fees or fines should be vacated as a matter of law: a $25 court supervision fee (625 ILCS 5/16-104c (West 2006)); a $5 drug court fee (55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f) (West 2006)); a $30 Children's Advocacy Center fine (55 ILCS…”
People v. Stuckey, 959 N.E.2d 740 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). · cites it 8× “The State also concedes that defendant is entitled to a $5-per-day presentence incarceration credit for a $10 mental health fine (55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d-5) (West 2008)), and a $5 youth division/peer court fine (55 ILCS 5/5-1101(e) (West 2008)).”
People v. Morrison, 2016 IL App (4th) 140712 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 3× “Monetary Credit Against Fines ¶ 25 Defendant argues he is entitled to a $5-per-day credit against any fines imposed for every day he spent in custody prior to sentencing. The court ordered the imposition of a $50 court-finance assessment (55 ILCS 5/5-1101(c) (West 2012)), a $10…”
Show all 167 citing cases →
— 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(a) — 46 cases
People v. Willis, 950 N.E.2d 265 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “Defendant contends that the trial court improperly assessed the DNA analysis fee pursuant to section 5-4-3(j) of the Unified Code of Corrections (730 ILCS 5/5-4-3(j) (West 2008)). He argues that he should *278 not be required to pay for DNA collection, analysis, or storage due…”
People v. Barr, 2019 IL App (1st) 163035 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019).
People v. Brown, 2018 IL App (1st) 160924 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018).
People v. Brown, 2018 IL App (1st) 160924 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019).
People v. Anthony, 951 N.E.2d 507 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011).
— 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(b) — 3 cases
People v. Mimes, 953 N.E.2d 55 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “The State concedes and we agree that the following fees or fines should be vacated as a matter of law: a $25 court supervision fee (625 ILCS 5/16-104c (West 2006)); a $5 drug court fee (55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f) (West 2006)); a $30 Children's Advocacy Center fine (55 ILCS…”
People v. Willis, 950 N.E.2d 265 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “Defendant contends that the trial court improperly assessed the DNA analysis fee pursuant to section 5-4-3(j) of the Unified Code of Corrections (730 ILCS 5/5-4-3(j) (West 2008)). He argues that he should *278 not be required to pay for DNA collection, analysis, or storage due…”
People v. Mimes, 2014 IL App (1st) 82747 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
— 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(c) — 42 cases
People v. Willis, 950 N.E.2d 265 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “Defendant contends that the trial court improperly assessed the DNA analysis fee pursuant to section 5-4-3(j) of the Unified Code of Corrections (730 ILCS 5/5-4-3(j) (West 2008)). He argues that he should *278 not be required to pay for DNA collection, analysis, or storage due…”
People v. Jones-Beard, 2019 IL App (1st) 162005 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019).
People v. O'Laughlin, 2012 IL App (4th) 110018 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “5), (5) (West 2010); (6) “State’s Atty”–55 ILCS 5/4-2002(a) (West 2010); (7) “Court”–55 ILCS 5/5-1101(c) (West 2010); (8) “Judicial Security”–55 ILCS 5/5-1103 (West 2010); (9) “Youth Diversion”–55 ILCS 5/5-1101(e) (West 2010); (10) “Child Advocacy Fee”–55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f-5)…”
People v. Smith, 2013 IL App (2d) 120691 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “Defendant was in custody for 282 days before sentencing and is thus entitled to a credit against any fine under section 110-14(a).”
People v. Johnson, 2015 IL App (3d) 140364 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “Specialty 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d-5) “On a judgment of guilty or grant of supervision.”
— 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(c)(1) — 32 cases
People v. Camacho, 2016 IL App (1st) 140604 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
People v. Johnson, 2019 IL App (1st) 161104 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019).
People v. Vara, 2018 IL 121823 (Ill. 2018).
People v. Camacho, 2016 IL App (1st) 140604 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “) 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(c)(3) $15* 2nd or more DUI 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d) $100* Drug-Court/Mental-Health Assessment 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d-5) $10* Youth-Diversion/Peer-Court charge 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(e) up to $5* Drug Court 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f) up to $5* Child Advocacy Center charge 55 ILCS…”
— 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(c)(2) — 1 case
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “) 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(c)(3) $15* 2nd or more DUI 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d) $100* Drug-Court/Mental-Health Assessment 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d-5) $10* Youth-Diversion/Peer-Court charge 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(e) up to $5* Drug Court 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f) up to $5* Child Advocacy Center charge 55 ILCS…”
— 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(c)(3) — 1 case
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “) 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(c)(3) $15* 2nd or more DUI 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d) $100* Drug-Court/Mental-Health Assessment 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d-5) $10* Youth-Diversion/Peer-Court charge 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(e) up to $5* Drug Court 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f) up to $5* Child Advocacy Center charge 55 ILCS…”
— 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d) — 4 cases
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “) 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(c)(3) $15* 2nd or more DUI 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d) $100* Drug-Court/Mental-Health Assessment 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d-5) $10* Youth-Diversion/Peer-Court charge 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(e) up to $5* Drug Court 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f) up to $5* Child Advocacy Center charge 55 ILCS…”
People v. Youngblood, 849 N.E.2d 423 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006).
People v. Lake, 2015 IL App (3d) 140031 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015).
People v. Lake, 2015 IL App (3d) 140031 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015).
— 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(e) — 31 cases
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “) 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(c)(3) $15* 2nd or more DUI 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d) $100* Drug-Court/Mental-Health Assessment 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d-5) $10* Youth-Diversion/Peer-Court charge 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(e) up to $5* Drug Court 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f) up to $5* Child Advocacy Center charge 55 ILCS…”
People v. Smith, 2014 IL App (4th) 121118 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “" 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d-5) (West 2008). The youth diversion/peer court fee was assessed pursuant to section 5-1101(e), which provides the fee "must be deposited into an account specifically for the operation and administration of a teen court, peer court, peer jury, youth court, or…”
People v. O'Laughlin, 2012 IL App (4th) 110018 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “5), (5) (West 2010); (6) “State’s Atty”–55 ILCS 5/4-2002(a) (West 2010); (7) “Court”–55 ILCS 5/5-1101(c) (West 2010); (8) “Judicial Security”–55 ILCS 5/5-1103 (West 2010); (9) “Youth Diversion”–55 ILCS 5/5-1101(e) (West 2010); (10) “Child Advocacy Fee”–55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f-5)…”
People v. Stuckey, 959 N.E.2d 740 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “The State also concedes that defendant is entitled to a $5-per-day presentence incarceration credit for a $10 mental health fine (55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d-5) (West 2008)), and a $5 youth division/peer court fine (55 ILCS 5/5-1101(e) (West 2008)).”
People v. Hible, 2016 IL App (4th) 131096 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
— 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(e)(2) — 5 cases
People v. Vara, 2018 IL 121823 (Ill. 2018).
People v. Vara, 2018 IL 121823 (Ill. 2019).
People v. Vara, 2016 IL App (2d) 140848 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
People v. Vara, 2016 IL App (2d) 140848 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017).
People v. Vara, 2016 IL App (2d) 140848 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017).
— 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f) — 53 cases
People v. Warren, 2016 IL App (4th) 120721-B (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “" 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f) (West 2010). ¶ 138 In this case, the $5 drug-court assessment imposed by the circuit clerk was a fine, despite its label as a "fee," because the assessment is intended to be used "for the operation and administration of the drug court.”
People v. Smith, 2014 IL App (4th) 121118 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “" 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d-5) (West 2008). The youth diversion/peer court fee was assessed pursuant to section 5-1101(e), which provides the fee "must be deposited into an account specifically for the operation and administration of a teen court, peer court, peer jury, youth court, or…”
People v. Rexroad, 2013 IL App (4th) 110981 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013).
People v. Long, 924 N.E.2d 511 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (4th) 120313 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “) 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(c)(3) $15* 2nd or more DUI 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d) $100* Drug-Court/Mental-Health Assessment 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(d-5) $10* Youth-Diversion/Peer-Court charge 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(e) up to $5* Drug Court 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f) up to $5* Child Advocacy Center charge 55 ILCS…”
— 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f)(2) — 8 cases
People v. Warren, 2016 IL App (4th) 120721-B (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “" 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(f) (West 2010). ¶ 138 In this case, the $5 drug-court assessment imposed by the circuit clerk was a fine, despite its label as a "fee," because the assessment is intended to be used "for the operation and administration of the drug court.”
People v. Unander, 936 N.E.2d 795 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
People v. Jake, 960 N.E.2d 45 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011).
People v. Long, 924 N.E.2d 511 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010).
People v. Warren, 2014 IL App (4th) 120721 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
— 55 ILCS 5/5-1101(g) — 3 cases
People v. Breeden, 2014 IL App (4th) 121049 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
People v. Hunter, 2014 IL App (3d) 120552 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
People v. Breeden, 2014 IL App (4th) 121049 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.