Illinois Compiled Statutes
620 ILCS 5/1 (2026)
Definitions
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(620 ILCS 5/1)
(from Ch. 15 1/2, par. 22.1)
Sec. 1. Definitions.
For the purposes of this Act, the words, terms, and phrases set forth in
Sections 2 to 23b, inclusive, shall have the meanings prescribed in such Sections
unless otherwise specifically defined, or unless another intention
clearly appears, or the context otherwise requires.
(Source: P.A. 100-863, eff. 8-14-18.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 2000–2003 · leading case: Spangenberg v. Verner, 747 N.E.2d 359 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001).
Spangenberg v. Verner, 747 N.E.2d 359 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “685 *364 (1996)), and the Illinois Aeronautics Act (620 ILCS 5/1 et seq. ( West 1998 )). Whether or not the Park District's decisions are based on the statutes that plaintiff references is of no matter because we find that the Park District's decisions whether to issue a license…”
People Ex Rel. Birkett v. City of Chicago, 779 N.E.2d 875 (Ill. 2002). “y of Du Page County, on behalf of the People of the State of Illinois, the County of Du Page, the Village of Bensenville, the City of Elmhurst, and the City of Wood Dale, filed a two-count amended complaint seeking (1) a declaration that the City of Chicago was constructing…”
Stebbings v. Univ. of Chicago, 726 N.E.2d 1136 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “Section 42 of the Illinois Aeronautics Act declares that “[t]he general public interest and safety, the safety of persons operating, using, or traveling in, aircraft, and of persons and property on the ground, and the interest of aeronautical progress requir[e] that aircraft…”
Philip v. Daley, 790 N.E.2d 961 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “ANALYSIS Defendants assert that the trial court should not have issued a preliminary injunction, arguing that the Aeronautics Act (620 ILCS 5/1 et seq. (West 2000)) does not require them to seek approval from IDOT prior to acquiring land and that, in the alternative, federal law…”
People Ex Rel. Birkett v. City of Chicago, 769 N.E.2d 84 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “Count II sought an injunction and was brought directly under the Illinois Aeronautics Act (Aeronautics Act) (620 ILCS 5/1 et seq. (West 1998)). Count II alleged that the City had in the past continued to undertake piecemeal expansion without seeking the approval of IDOT.”
People v. City of Chicago (Ill. 2002). “y of Du Page County, on behalf of the People of the State of Illinois, the County of Du Page, the Village of Bensenville, the City of Elmhurst, and the City of Wood Dale, filed a two-count amended complaint seeking (1) a declaration that the City of Chicago was constructing…”
Spangenberg v. Verner Text corrected (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “685 (1996)), and the Illinois Aeronautics Act (620 ILCS 5/1 et seq. ( West 1998 )). Whether or not the Park District's decisions are based on the statutes that plaintiff references is of no matter because we find that the Park District's decisions whether to issue a license or…”
Philip v. Daley (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “ANALYSIS Defendants assert that the trial court should not have issued a preliminary injunction, arguing that the Aeronautics Act (620 ILCS 5/1 et seq . (West 2000)) does not require them to seek approval from IDOT prior to acquiring land and that, in the alternative, federal…”
Stebbings v. Univ. of Chicago (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “Section 42 of the Illinois Aeronautics Act declares that "[t]he general public interest and safety, the safety of persons operating, using, or traveling in, aircraft, and of persons and property on the ground, and the interest of aeronautical progress requir[e] that aircraft…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|