Illinois Compiled Statutes
625 ILCS 5/1-113 (2026)
Crosswalk
✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(625 ILCS 5/1-113)
(from Ch. 95 1/2, par. 1-113)
Sec. 1-113.
Crosswalk.
(a) That part of a roadway
at an intersection included within the connections of the lateral lines
of the sidewalks on opposite sides of the highway measured from the curbs
or, in the absence
of curbs, from the edges of the traversable roadway, and in the absence
of a sidewalk on one side of the highway, that part of the highway included
within the extension of the lateral line of the existing sidewalk to the
side of the highway without the sidewalk, with such extension forming a
right angle to the centerline of the highway;
(b) Any portion of a roadway at an intersection or elsewhere distinctly
indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markings on the surface
placed in accordance with the provisions in the Manual adopted by the
Department of Transportation as authorized in Section 11-301.
(Source: P.A. 83-831.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1999–2021 · leading case: Crespo-Fregoso v. City of Chicago, 2021 IL App (1st) 200972, 192 N.E.3d 761.
Crespo-Fregoso v. City of Chicago, 2021 IL App (1st) 200972, 192 N.E.3d 761. “” 625 ILCS 5/1-113 (West 2018). ¶ 22 The Manual, adopted pursuant to section 11-301 of the Illinois Vehicle Code (625 ILCS 5/11-301 (West 2018)), provides the manner in which a crosswalk may be marked for pedestrian use.”
Dunet v. Simmons, 2013 IL App (1st) 120603, 989 N.E.2d 279. “625 ILCS 5/1-113(a) (West 2010). Therefore, according to Dunet, section 3-102(a) of the Tort Immunity Act did not apply and the defendants owed decedent a duty of care.”
Harden v. The City of Chicago, 2013 IL App (1st) 120846. “” 625 ILCS 5/1-113 (West 2008). ¶ 24 The Illinois Vehicle Code also defines “sidewalk” as “[t]hat portion of a street between the curb lines, or the lateral lines of a roadway, and the adjacent property lines, intended for use of pedestrians.”
Turner v. City of Granite City, 2021 IL App (5th) 200291-U. “3 the street under section 1-113 of the Illinois Vehicle Code (Code) (625 ILCS 5/1-113 (West 2018)). Under the Code, plaintiff argued it was the law that “a crosswalk need not be painted or marked on the surface of the street to constitute a statutory crosswalk but at any…”
Kavales v. City of Berwyn, No. 1-97-4181 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. May 24, 1999). “) 625 ILCS 5/1-113 (West 1994). Contrary to Berwyn's assertion, a piece of property may constitute a "crosswalk" if it meets the requirements of either, not both, section (a) or section (b).”
625 ILCS 5/1-113(a): 2 cases
Dunet v. Simmons, 2013 IL App (1st) 120603, 989 N.E.2d 279. “625 ILCS 5/1-113(a) (West 2010). Therefore, according to Dunet, section 3-102(a) of the Tort Immunity Act did not apply and the defendants owed decedent a duty of care.”
Turner v. City of Granite City, 2021 IL App (5th) 200291-U. “3 the street under section 1-113 of the Illinois Vehicle Code (Code) (625 ILCS 5/1-113 (West 2018)). Under the Code, plaintiff argued it was the law that “a crosswalk need not be painted or marked on the surface of the street to constitute a statutory crosswalk but at any…”
625 ILCS 5/1-113(b): 1 case
Crespo-Fregoso v. City of Chicago, 2021 IL App (1st) 200972, 192 N.E.3d 761. “” 625 ILCS 5/1-113 (West 2018). ¶ 22 The Manual, adopted pursuant to section 11-301 of the Illinois Vehicle Code (625 ILCS 5/11-301 (West 2018)), provides the manner in which a crosswalk may be marked for pedestrian use.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|