ILCS » Chapter 70 · Act 1215
Illinois Compiled Statutes

70 ILCS 1215/33 (2026)

Any person who shall willfully or through culpable negligence violate any of the provisions of this Act shall be guilty of a Class B misdemeanor

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(70 ILCS 1215/33) (from Ch. 24 1/2, par. 146)
    Sec. 33. Any person who shall willfully or through culpable negligence violate any of the provisions of this Act shall be guilty of a Class B misdemeanor.
(Source: P.A. 77-2362.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2002–2003 · leading case: People v. Boclair, 789 N.E.2d 734 (Ill. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Boclair, 789 N.E.2d 734 (Ill. 2002). · cites it 2× “33 (West 2000) (Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Act); 110 ILCS 70/46 (West 2000) (State Universities Civil Service Act); 725 ILCS 5/122-1(c) (West 2000) (Post-Conviction Hearing Act); 750 ILCS 50/5 (West 2000) (Adoption Act); 188 Ill.”
People v. Rissley, 795 N.E.2d 174 (Ill. 2003). · cites it 2× “33 (West 2000) (Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Act); 110 ILCS 70/46 (West 2000) (State Universities Civil Service Act); 725 ILCS 5/122-1(c) (West 2000) (Post-Conviction Hearing Act); 750 ILCS 50/5 (West 2000) (Adoption Act); 188 Ill.”
People v. Boclair, No. 89388, 89471, 89534 cons. Rel (Ill. Aug. 29, 2002). “33 (West 2000) (Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Act); 110 ILCS 70/46 (West 2000) (State Universities Civil Service Act); 725 ILCS 5/122–1(c) (West 2000) (Post-Conviction Hearing Act); 750 ILCS 50/5 (West 2000) (Adoption Act); 188 Ill.”
People v. Rissley, No. 82536 Rel (Ill. June 19, 2003). “33 (West 2000) (Metropolitan Water Reclamation District Act); 110 ILCS 70/46 (West 2000) (State Universities Civil Service Act); 725 ILCS 5/122–1(c) (West 2000) (Post-Conviction Hearing Act); 750 ILCS 50/5 (West 2000) (Adoption Act); 188 Ill.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.