ILCS » Chapter 705 · Act 405
Illinois Compiled Statutes

705 ILCS 405/1-2 (2026)

Purpose and policy

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(705 ILCS 405/1-2) (from Ch. 37, par. 801-2)
    Sec. 1-2. Purpose and policy.
    (1) The purpose of this Act is to secure for each minor subject hereto such care and guidance, preferably in the minor's own home, as will serve the safety and moral, emotional, mental, and physical welfare of the minor and the best interests of the community; to preserve and strengthen the minor's family ties whenever possible, removing the minor from the custody of the minor's parents only when the minor's safety or welfare or the protection of the public cannot be adequately safeguarded without removal; if the child is removed from the custody of the minor's parent, the Department of Children and Family Services immediately shall consider concurrent planning, as described in Section 5 of the Children and Family Services Act so that permanency may occur at the earliest opportunity; consideration should be given so that if reunification fails or is delayed, the placement made is the best available placement to provide permanency for the child; and, when the minor is removed from the minor's own family, to secure for the minor custody, care and discipline as nearly as possible equivalent to that which should be given by the minor's parents, and in cases where it should and can properly be done to place the minor in a family home so that the minor may become a member of the family by legal adoption or otherwise. Provided that a ground for unfitness under the Adoption Act can be met, it may be appropriate to expedite termination of parental rights:
        (a) when reasonable efforts are inappropriate, or
    
have been provided and were unsuccessful, and there are aggravating circumstances including, but not limited to, those cases in which (i) the child or another child of that child's parent was (A) abandoned, (B) tortured, or (C) chronically abused or (ii) the parent is criminally convicted of (A) first degree murder or second degree murder of any child, (B) attempt or conspiracy to commit first degree murder or second degree murder of any child, (C) solicitation to commit murder, solicitation to commit murder for hire, solicitation to commit second degree murder of any child, or aggravated assault in violation of subdivision (a)(13) of Section 12-2 of the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012, or (D) aggravated criminal sexual assault in violation of Section 11-1.40(a)(1) or 12-14.1(a)(1) of the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012; or
        (b) when the parental rights of a parent with respect
    
to another child of the parent have been involuntarily terminated; or
        (c) in those extreme cases in which the parent's
    
incapacity to care for the child, combined with an extremely poor prognosis for treatment or rehabilitation, justifies expedited termination of parental rights.
    (2) In all proceedings under this Act the court may direct the course thereof so as promptly to ascertain the jurisdictional facts and fully to gather information bearing upon the current condition and future welfare of persons subject to this Act. This Act shall be administered in a spirit of humane concern, not only for the rights of the parties, but also for the fears and the limits of understanding of all who appear before the court.
    (3) In all procedures under this Act, the following shall apply:
        (a) The procedural rights assured to the minor shall
    
be the rights of adults unless specifically precluded by laws which enhance the protection of such minors.
        (b) Every child has a right to services necessary to
    
the child's safety and proper development, including health, education and social services.
        (c) The parents' right to the custody of their child
    
shall not prevail when the court determines that it is contrary to the health, safety, and best interests of the child.
    (4) This Act shall be liberally construed to carry out the foregoing purpose and policy.
(Source: P.A. 103-22, eff. 8-8-23.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 184 cases (34 in the last 5 years), 1995–2026 · leading case: In re Tyianna J., 2017 IL App (1st) 162306 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Tyianna J., 2017 IL App (1st) 162306 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 6× “705 ILCS 405/1-2 (West 2014). In In re Angela D.”
People v. Mandi H., 830 N.E.2d 498 (Ill. 2005). · cites it 4× “The Act grants circuit courts authority to make custody determinations in the best interests of the child.”
In re Tr. A., 2020 IL App (2d) 200225 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). · cites it 4× “to terminate respondent’s parental rights were unreasonable, arbitrary, or not based on the evidence, or that an opposite conclusion is clearly apparent. ¶ 60 D. Expedited Termination ¶ 61 Alternatively, respondent argues that the trial court erred in expediting the termination…”
In re M.M., 2016 IL 119932 (Ill. 2016). · cites it 3× “” 705 ILCS 405/1-2(1) (West 2012). Moreover: “The parents’ right to the custody of their child shall not prevail when the court determines that it is contrary to the health, safety, and best interests of the child.”
In re D.M., 2016 IL App (1st) 152608 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 3× “705 ILCS 405/1-2(1), (3) (West 2012); see In re J.”
In re M.M., 2016 IL 119932 (Ill. 2017). · cites it 3× “” 705 ILCS 405/1-2(1) (West 2012). Moreover: “The parents’ right to the custody of their child shall not prevail when the court determines that it is contrary to the health, safety, and best interests of the child.”
People v. Arthur H., 819 N.E.2d 734 (Ill. 2004). “" Our holding that the Act instructs the circuit court during the adjudicatory hearing to determine whether the child is neglected, and not whether the parents are neglectful, furthers the purpose and policy of the Juvenile Court Act, which is to ensure the best interests and…”
In re N.B., 2019 IL App (2d) 180797 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). · cites it 2× “"Unfounded," on the other hand, refers to any report where it is determined that no credible evidence of the alleged abuse or neglect exists. 89 Ill. Adm. Code 300.20 (2018).”
In re Z.L., 2021 IL 126931 (Ill. 2021). “705 ILCS 405/1-2 (West 2000).” Id. at 467 .”
In Re Ds, 763 N.E.2d 251 (Ill. 2002). · cites it 7× “" 705 ILCS 405/1-2(1) (West 1998). The goals of the Act include preserving and strengthening family ties "whenever possible," but if reunification is delayed or fails, then the best available placement is to be made to provide permanency for the child.”
In Re Lawrence M., 670 N.E.2d 710 (Ill. 1996). · cites it 2× “More particularly, section 2-10 of the Juvenile Court Act (705 ILCS 405/2-10 (West 1994)), which pertains to temporary custody proceedings following the filing of a petition alleging that a minor is abused, neglected or dependent, is part of a comprehensive statutory scheme…”
People Ex Rel. Devine v. Stralka, 877 N.E.2d 416 (Ill. 2007). · cites it 2× “" 705 ILCS 405/1-2(1) (West 2004). I have every confidence that the judges who have vacated delinquency findings following a juvenile's successful completion of probation were acting in good faith, believing their actions to be an appropriate extension of the authority afforded…”
Show all 184 citing cases →
— 705 ILCS 405/1-2(1) — 91 cases
People v. Mandi H., 830 N.E.2d 498 (Ill. 2005). “The Act grants circuit courts authority to make custody determinations in the best interests of the child.”
In re M.M., 2016 IL 119932 (Ill. 2016). “” 705 ILCS 405/1-2(1) (West 2012). Moreover: “The parents’ right to the custody of their child shall not prevail when the court determines that it is contrary to the health, safety, and best interests of the child.”
In re Tyianna J., 2017 IL App (1st) 162306 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “705 ILCS 405/1-2 (West 2014). In In re Angela D.”
In re Tr. A., 2020 IL App (2d) 200225 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “to terminate respondent’s parental rights were unreasonable, arbitrary, or not based on the evidence, or that an opposite conclusion is clearly apparent. ¶ 60 D. Expedited Termination ¶ 61 Alternatively, respondent argues that the trial court erred in expediting the termination…”
In re D.M., 2016 IL App (1st) 152608 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “705 ILCS 405/1-2(1), (3) (West 2012); see In re J.”
— 705 ILCS 405/1-2(1)(a) — 4 cases
In re Tyianna J., 2017 IL App (1st) 162306 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “705 ILCS 405/1-2 (West 2014). In In re Angela D.”
People v. Boden, 713 N.E.2d 253 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999).
In Re Kbj, 713 N.E.2d 253 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999).
In re M.H., 2026 IL App (1st) 250013-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2026).
— 705 ILCS 405/1-2(1)(a)(i)(B) — 2 cases
In re Tr. A., 2020 IL App (2d) 200225 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “to terminate respondent’s parental rights were unreasonable, arbitrary, or not based on the evidence, or that an opposite conclusion is clearly apparent. ¶ 60 D. Expedited Termination ¶ 61 Alternatively, respondent argues that the trial court erred in expediting the termination…”
In re Tr. A., 2020 IL App (2d) 200225 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020).
— 705 ILCS 405/1-2(1)(b) — 3 cases
In re Tyianna J., 2017 IL App (1st) 162306 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “705 ILCS 405/1-2 (West 2014). In In re Angela D.”
In re N.B., 2019 IL App (2d) 180797 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “"Unfounded," on the other hand, refers to any report where it is determined that no credible evidence of the alleged abuse or neglect exists. 89 Ill. Adm. Code 300.20 (2018).”
In re N.B., 2019 IL App (2d) 180797 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019).
— 705 ILCS 405/1-2(1)(c) — 2 cases
In re Tyianna J., 2017 IL App (1st) 162306 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “705 ILCS 405/1-2 (West 2014). In In re Angela D.”
In re Tr. A., 2020 IL App (2d) 200225 (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “to terminate respondent’s parental rights were unreasonable, arbitrary, or not based on the evidence, or that an opposite conclusion is clearly apparent. ¶ 60 D. Expedited Termination ¶ 61 Alternatively, respondent argues that the trial court erred in expediting the termination…”
— 705 ILCS 405/1-2(2) — 30 cases
People v. Mandi H., 830 N.E.2d 498 (Ill. 2005). “The Act grants circuit courts authority to make custody determinations in the best interests of the child.”
People Ex Rel. Devine v. Stralka, 877 N.E.2d 416 (Ill. 2007). “" 705 ILCS 405/1-2(1) (West 2004). I have every confidence that the judges who have vacated delinquency findings following a juvenile's successful completion of probation were acting in good faith, believing their actions to be an appropriate extension of the authority afforded…”
In re Zoey L., 2021 IL App (1st) 210063 (Ill. App. Ct. 2021).
In Re Ds, 763 N.E.2d 251 (Ill. 2002). “" 705 ILCS 405/1-2(1) (West 1998). The goals of the Act include preserving and strengthening family ties "whenever possible," but if reunification is delayed or fails, then the best available placement is to be made to provide permanency for the child.”
In Re Andrea F., 764 N.E.2d 1281 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002).
— 705 ILCS 405/1-2(3)(a) — 5 cases
In Re Ds, 763 N.E.2d 251 (Ill. 2002). “" 705 ILCS 405/1-2(1) (West 1998). The goals of the Act include preserving and strengthening family ties "whenever possible," but if reunification is delayed or fails, then the best available placement is to be made to provide permanency for the child.”
In Re Sp, 696 N.E.2d 739 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998).
In Re Jjm, 701 N.E.2d 1170 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998).
In re S.R., 2025 IL App (1st) 250218 (Ill. App. Ct. 2025).
City of Urbana v. Andrew N.B. (Ill. App. Ct. 2002).
— 705 ILCS 405/1-2(3)(b) — 1 case
In Re Desiree O., 887 N.E.2d 59 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
— 705 ILCS 405/1-2(3)(c) — 9 cases
In re M.M., 2016 IL 119932 (Ill. 2016). “” 705 ILCS 405/1-2(1) (West 2012). Moreover: “The parents’ right to the custody of their child shall not prevail when the court determines that it is contrary to the health, safety, and best interests of the child.”
In re M.M., 2016 IL 119932 (Ill. 2017). “” 705 ILCS 405/1-2(1) (West 2012). Moreover: “The parents’ right to the custody of their child shall not prevail when the court determines that it is contrary to the health, safety, and best interests of the child.”
In Re Os, 848 N.E.2d 130 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006).
In Re Andrea F., 764 N.E.2d 1281 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002).
In Re Desiree O., 887 N.E.2d 59 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
— 705 ILCS 405/1-2(4) — 19 cases
People v. Mandi H., 830 N.E.2d 498 (Ill. 2005). “The Act grants circuit courts authority to make custody determinations in the best interests of the child.”
In re Dal D., 2017 IL App (4th) 160893 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017).
In Re Lawrence M., 670 N.E.2d 710 (Ill. 1996). “More particularly, section 2-10 of the Juvenile Court Act (705 ILCS 405/2-10 (West 1994)), which pertains to temporary custody proceedings following the filing of a petition alleging that a minor is abused, neglected or dependent, is part of a comprehensive statutory scheme…”
In re A.L., 2012 IL App (2d) 110992 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012).
In re D.M., 2016 IL App (1st) 152608 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “705 ILCS 405/1-2(1), (3) (West 2012); see In re J.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.