ILCS » Chapter 705 · Act 405
Illinois Compiled Statutes

705 ILCS 405/5-14 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(705 ILCS 405/5-14) (from Ch. 37, par. 805-14)
    Sec. 5-14. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 88-680, eff. 1-1-95. Repealed by P.A. 90-590, eff. 1-1-99.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1995–1996 · leading case: People v. Rodriguez, 657 N.E.2d 699 (Ill. App. Ct. 2d Dist. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Rodriguez, 657 N.E.2d 699 (Ill. App. Ct. 2d Dist. 1995). · cites it 2× “Defendant maintains that the amended petition should have been filed after the order for detention but before the 10-day speedy adjudication requirement of the Juvenile Court Act (705 ILCS 405/5-14(b)(2) (West 1992)) had expired.”
In Re CTA, 655 N.E.2d 1116 (Ill. App. Ct. 2d Dist. 1995). “Subsection (4) provides that a period of continuance under supervision may not exceed 24 months. Subsection (7) provides that the filing of a petition to revoke the continuance under supervision tolls the period of the continuance under supervision until the final determination.”
In Re Af, 668 N.E.2d 1168 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1996). · cites it 2× “705 ILCS 405/5-14(1) (West 1992). Respondent was charged with arson on April 23, 1994, and appeared with his attorney before the trial court on June 30, 1994.”
705 ILCS 405/5-14(1): 2 cases
In Re CTA, 655 N.E.2d 1116 (Ill. App. Ct. 2d Dist. 1995). “Subsection (4) provides that a period of continuance under supervision may not exceed 24 months. Subsection (7) provides that the filing of a petition to revoke the continuance under supervision tolls the period of the continuance under supervision until the final determination.”
In Re Af, 668 N.E.2d 1168 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1996). “705 ILCS 405/5-14(1) (West 1992). Respondent was charged with arson on April 23, 1994, and appeared with his attorney before the trial court on June 30, 1994.”
705 ILCS 405/5-14(b)(2): 1 case
People v. Rodriguez, 657 N.E.2d 699 (Ill. App. Ct. 2d Dist. 1995). “Defendant maintains that the amended petition should have been filed after the order for detention but before the 10-day speedy adjudication requirement of the Juvenile Court Act (705 ILCS 405/5-14(b)(2) (West 1992)) had expired.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.