Illinois Compiled Statutes
720 ILCS 570/101 (2026)
This Act shall be known as and may be cited as the "Illinois Controlled Substances Act
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(720 ILCS 570/101)
(from Ch. 56 1/2, par. 1101)
Sec. 101.
This Act shall be known as and may be cited as the "Illinois Controlled Substances Act."
(Source: P.A. 77-757.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2001–2017 · leading case: People v. Hardman, 2017 IL 121453 (Ill. 2017).
People v. Hardman, 2017 IL 121453 (Ill. 2017). “" 720 ILCS 570/101 et seq. (West 2012). However, the term has acquired a settled meaning through judicial construction and legislative acquiescence.”
People v. Brown, 798 N.E.2d 800 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “JUSTICE GILLERAN JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the court: The defendant, Bruce Brown, was charged with numerous offenses under the Illinois Controlled Substances Act (720 ILCS 570/101 et seq. (West 2000)) and the Cannabis Control Act (720 ILCS 550/1 et seq.”
People v. Renner, 748 N.E.2d 1272 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “(West 1998)) or the Illinois Controlled Substances Act (720 ILCS 570/101 et seq. (West 1998)), to use lab reports in lieu of actual testimony as prima facie evidence of the contents of the substance at issue unless the defendant filed a demand for the testimony of the witness…”
People v. Renner Opinion text corrected (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “(West 1998)) or the Illinois Controlled Substances Act (720 ILCS 570/101 et seq. (West 1998)), to use lab reports in lieu of actual testimony as prima facie evidence of the contents of the substance at issue unless the defendant filed a demand for the testimony of the witness…”
People v. Brown (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “______________________________________________________________________________ JUSTICE GILLERAN JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the court: The defendant, Bruce Brown, was charged with numerous offenses under the Illinois Controlled Substances Act (720 ILCS 570/101 et seq .…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|