ILCS » Chapter 720 · Act 646
Illinois Compiled Statutes

720 ILCS 646/1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(720 ILCS 646/1)
    Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act.
(Source: P.A. 94-556, eff. 9-11-05.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2008–2025 · leading case: People v. Martin, 2011 IL 109102 (Ill. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Martin, 2011 IL 109102 (Ill. 2011). “], or methamphetamine as listed in -4- the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act [720 ILCS 646/1 et seq.]. *** (d) Aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol, other drug or drugs, or intoxicating compound or compounds, or any combination thereof.”
People v. Marzonie, 2018 IL App (4th) 160107 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “The court then concluded that "[w]hile the acts of possession committed by defendant in the instant case are closely related, under the statutory scheme implemented by our General Assembly pursuant to the [Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act (Act) ( 720 ILCS…”
People v. Martin, 955 N.E.2d 1058 (Ill. 2011). “], or methamphetamine as listed in the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act [720 ILCS 646/1 et seq. ]. * * * *1062 (d) Aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol, other drug or drugs, or intoxicating compound or compounds, or any combination thereof.”
People v. Marzonie, 2018 IL App (4th) 160107 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “The court then concluded that “[w]hile the acts of possession committed by defendant in the instant case are closely related, under the statutory scheme implemented by our General Assembly pursuant to the [Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act (Act) (720 ILCS…”
People v. Tomczak, 921 N.E.2d 736 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “(West 2008))), or methamphetamine (as listed in the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act (720 ILCS 646/1 et seq. (West 2008))). 625 ILCS 5/11— 501.”
People v. Bell, 2012 IL App (5th) 100276 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “-3- ¶ 14 ANALYSIS ¶ 15 The first issue the defendant raises on appeal is that the punishment for attempted possession of anhydrous ammonia is unconstitutionally disproportionate to the punishment for general attempt of the same crime and unconstitutionally disproportionate when…”
People v. Shannon, 2024 IL App (5th) 231051 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “Nor is such a finding likely given the legislative purpose of the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act (720 ILCS 646/1 et seq. (West 2022)), which states: “The purpose of this Act is to reduce the damage that the manufacture, distribution, and use of…”
People v. Hoffman, 2025 IL 130344 (Ill. 2025). · cites it 2× “(West 2022)), the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act (720 ILCS 646/1 et. seq. (West 2022)), nor the Cannabis Control Act (720 ILCS 550/1 et seq.”
People v. Bush, 2015 IL App (5th) 130224 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “¶9 In the instant case, defendant was charged under the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act (Act) (720 ILCS 646/1 et seq. (West 2012)). Section 5 of 3 the Act sets forth the purpose of the Act as follows: "§ 5.”
People v. Kelly, 2018 IL App (1st) 162334 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “(West 2012))], or in a misdemeanor violation of the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act [(720 ILCS 646/1 et seq. (West 2012))] ***.”
People v. Bush, 2015 IL App (5th) 130224 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “¶9 In the instant case, defendant was charged under the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act (Act) (720 ILCS 646/1 et seq. (West 2012)). Section 5 of the Act sets forth the purpose of the Act as follows: “§ 5.”
People v. Williams, 2024 IL App (4th) 230229-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “” Here, however, defendant was convicted of violating the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act (720 ILCS 646/1 et seq. (West 2022)), not either of the acts construed in Garcia.”
Show all 20 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.