Illinois Compiled Statutes
725 ILCS 150/3 (2026)
Applicability
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(725 ILCS 150/3)
(from Ch. 56 1/2, par. 1673)
Sec. 3. Applicability. The provisions of this Act are applicable to
all property forfeitable under the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, the
Cannabis Control Act, the Illinois Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act.
(Source: P.A. 96-573, eff. 8-18-09.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2013–2025 · leading case: People v. $174,980 United States Currency, 2013 IL App (1st) 122480 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013).
People v. $174,980 United States Currency, 2013 IL App (1st) 122480 (Ill. App. Ct. 2013). “” 725 ILCS 150/3 (West 2010). The three Drug Control Acts relied upon by the State each provide that the following are subject to forfeiture: (1) everything of value furnished, or intended to be furnished, in exchange for a substance in violation of those Drug Control Acts; (2)…”
People v. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer, 2019 IL App (3d) 180084 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “See 720 ILCS 570/505(c) (West 2016); 725 ILCS 150/3 (West 2016). In a proceeding under the Forfeiture Act, the State is required, within 14 days of the seizure of the property, to seek a preliminary determination from the trial court that there is probable cause that the…”
People v. $33,260 United States Currency, 2024 IL App (4th) 231465 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “725 ILCS 150/3 (West 2022). The Cannabis Control Act provides, in relevant part, that “everything of value furnished or intended to be furnished by any person in exchange for a substance in violation of this Act” is subject to forfeiture.”
People v. One 2006 Chevrolet Corvette, 2025 IL App (5th) 230166-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2025). “See 725 ILCS 150/3 (West 2022). The Cannabis Control Act provides, in relevant part, that “everything of value furnished or intended to be furnished by any person in exchange for a substance in violation of this Act” is subject to forfeiture.”
People v. $35,315.00 United States Currency, 2016 IL App (4th) 150685 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “2007); 725 ILCS 150/3 (West 2014). Both of those acts provide, in relevant part, all proceeds traceable to an exchange for a substance in violation of the acts are subject to forfeiture.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|