ILCS » Chapter 725 · Act 210
Illinois Compiled Statutes

725 ILCS 210/1 (2026)

This Act may be cited as the State's Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor's Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(725 ILCS 210/1) (from Ch. 14, par. 201)
    Sec. 1. This Act may be cited as the State's Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor's Act.
(Source: P.A. 84-1062.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2002–2014 · leading case: People v. Woodall, 777 N.E.2d 1014 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Woodall, 777 N.E.2d 1014 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “The most obvious matters, consistent with the Agency’s primary purpose, are criminal appeals.”
People v. Ward, 762 N.E.2d 685 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “Zalar prosecuting the case, on the basis that the State’s Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor’s Act (725 ILCS 210/1 et seq. (West 1998)) did not authorize the State’s Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor to prosecute the instant case.”
People v. Jennings, 798 N.E.2d 1211 (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “The defendant objected to Zalar prosecuting the case, on the basis that the Act at that time (725 ILCS 210/1 et seq. (West 1998)) did not authorize an employee of the State’s Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor’s office to prosecute the defendant under the Cannabis Control Act (720…”
Uphoff v. Grosskopf, 2013 IL App (4th) 130422 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “Public Act 96-900 amended the State’s Attorneys -4- Appellate Prosecutor’s Act (SAAP Act) (725 ILCS 210/1 to 11 (West 2012)), which created the office of the State’s Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor (SAAP).”
People v. Woodall Corrected Opinion 10/2/02 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “The most obvious matters, consistent with the Agency's primary purpose, are criminal appeals.”
People v. Ward (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “Zalar prosecuting the case, on the basis that the State's Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor's Act (725 ILCS 210/1 et seq. (West 1998)) did not authorize the State's Attorneys Appellate Prosecutor to prosecute the instant case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.