Illinois Compiled Statutes

725 ILCS 5/103-3 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(725 ILCS 5/103-3)
    Sec. 103-3. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 102-28, eff. 6-25-21. Repealed by P.A. 102-694, eff. 1-7-22.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1999–2026 · leading case: People v.Salamon, 2022 IL 125722 (Ill. 2022).
People v.Salamon, 2022 IL 125722 (Ill. 2022). · cites it 5× “1970), and his statutory right to communicate with an attorney or family member under section 103-3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (725 ILCS 5/103-3 (West 2012)). ¶5 A. Suppression Hearing ¶6 At the hearing on the motion to suppress, defendant testified that he was…”
People v. Williams, 2017 IL App (1st) 142733 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 4× “Defendant argues that the denial of his request in this case constituted a violation of section 103-3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (Code) (725 ILCS 5/103-3 (West 2016)) and a violation of his due process rights requiring suppression of his implicative statements.”
People v. Williams, 2017 IL App (1st) 142733 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 3× “Defendant argues that the denial of his request in this case constituted a violation of section 103-3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (Code) (725 ILCS 5/103-3 (West 2016)) and a violation of his due process rights requiring suppression of his implicative statements.”
People v. Streeter, 2024 IL App (1st) 191825 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). · cites it 3× “statements should be excluded because (1) defendant’s statements to the police were taken after he had expressed his desire to stop communicating to the police, in violation the United States Constitution and Illinois Constitution, and (2) the police denied defendant’s repeated…”
People v. Green, 2014 IL App (3d) 120522 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 3× “2 He erroneously relies on section 103-3 of the Code (725 ILCS 5/103-3 (West 2008)) and also cites a distinguishable case, Haynes v.”
People v. Green, 2014 IL App (3d) 120522 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 3× “4 He erroneously relies on section 103-3 of the Code (725 ILCS 5/103-3 (West 2008)) and also cites a distinguishable case, Haynes v.”
People v. Sanchez, 2018 IL App (1st) 143899 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “The prosecutor argued that the jurors should not believe Sanchez's statement that Estrada brought the gun, as the prosecutor, relying solely on Flores's assent to the detectives' suggestions, argued that Sanchez purchased the gun a week before the shooting and brought it to the…”
People v. Leverson, 2024 IL App (1st) 211083 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). · cites it 2× “See 725 ILCS 5/103-3(a) (West 2012). Nor did the detectives end their questioning at that moment; they continued to interrogate him unabated, despite their obligations to cease the interrogation immediately.”
People v. Sanchez, 2018 IL App (1st) 143899 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “725 ILCS 5/103-3(a) (West 2012). ¶ 76 Even if a court could regard the statements as voluntary, the prosecution, in its arguments at trial, conceded that the jurors should not rely on almost all of the statements Sanchez made in the lengthy interrogation.”
People v. Streeter, 2022 IL App (1st) 191825-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). · cites it 3× “-2- 1-19-1825 and (2) the police denied defendant’s repeated requests to call his family, in violation of section 103-3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Code) (725 ILCS 5/103-3 (West 2010)). ¶7 At the suppression hearing, defendant testified that on October 12, 2011, he was…”
People v. Davis, 2023 IL App (4th) 220278-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “¶ 40 At the time of defendant’s February 2014 statements, section 103-3(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (Code of Criminal Procedure) (725 ILCS 5/103-3(a) (West 2014)) provided arrestees with a “right to communicate” by phone or other means with family members and an…”
People v. Harris, 2023 IL App (1st) 191916-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “1-19-1916 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (Code) (725 ILCS 5/103-3(a) (West 2014) 4 provides that he had the “right to communicate” by phone with family members.”
— 725 ILCS 5/103-3(a) — 17 cases
People v.Salamon, 2022 IL 125722 (Ill. 2022). “1970), and his statutory right to communicate with an attorney or family member under section 103-3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (725 ILCS 5/103-3 (West 2012)). ¶5 A. Suppression Hearing ¶6 At the hearing on the motion to suppress, defendant testified that he was…”
People v. Sanchez, 2018 IL App (1st) 143899 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “The prosecutor argued that the jurors should not believe Sanchez's statement that Estrada brought the gun, as the prosecutor, relying solely on Flores's assent to the detectives' suggestions, argued that Sanchez purchased the gun a week before the shooting and brought it to the…”
People v. Leverson, 2024 IL App (1st) 211083 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “See 725 ILCS 5/103-3(a) (West 2012). Nor did the detectives end their questioning at that moment; they continued to interrogate him unabated, despite their obligations to cease the interrogation immediately.”
People v. Williams, 2017 IL App (1st) 142733 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “Defendant argues that the denial of his request in this case constituted a violation of section 103-3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (Code) (725 ILCS 5/103-3 (West 2016)) and a violation of his due process rights requiring suppression of his implicative statements.”
People v. Green, 2014 IL App (3d) 120522 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “2 He erroneously relies on section 103-3 of the Code (725 ILCS 5/103-3 (West 2008)) and also cites a distinguishable case, Haynes v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.