ILCS » Chapter 725 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

725 ILCS 5/110-10 (2026)

Conditions of pretrial release

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(725 ILCS 5/110-10) (from Ch. 38, par. 110-10)
    Sec. 110-10. Conditions of pretrial release.
    (a) If a person is released prior to conviction, the conditions of pretrial release shall be that he or she will:
        (1) Appear to answer the charge in the court having
    
jurisdiction on a day certain and thereafter as ordered by the court until discharged or final order of the court;
        (2) Submit himself or herself to the orders and
    
process of the court;
        (3) (Blank);
        (4) Not violate any criminal statute of any
    
jurisdiction;
        (5) At a time and place designated by the court,
    
surrender all firearms in his or her possession to a law enforcement officer designated by the court to take custody of and impound the firearms and physically surrender his or her Firearm Owner's Identification Card to the clerk of the circuit court when the offense the person has been charged with is a forcible felony, stalking, aggravated stalking, domestic battery, any violation of the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, the Methamphetamine Control and Community Protection Act, or the Cannabis Control Act that is classified as a Class 2 or greater felony, or any felony violation of Article 24 of the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012; the court may, however, forgo the imposition of this condition when the circumstances of the case clearly do not warrant it or when its imposition would be impractical; if the Firearm Owner's Identification Card is confiscated, the clerk of the circuit court shall mail the confiscated card to the Illinois State Police; all legally possessed firearms shall be returned to the person upon the charges being dismissed, or if the person is found not guilty, unless the finding of not guilty is by reason of insanity; and
        (6) At a time and place designated by the court,
    
submit to a psychological evaluation when the person has been charged with a violation of item (4) of subsection (a) of Section 24-1 of the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012 and that violation occurred in a school or in any conveyance owned, leased, or contracted by a school to transport students to or from school or a school-related activity, or on any public way within 1,000 feet of real property comprising any school.
    Psychological evaluations ordered pursuant to this Section shall be completed promptly and made available to the State, the defendant, and the court. As a further condition of pretrial release under these circumstances, the court shall order the defendant to refrain from entering upon the property of the school, including any conveyance owned, leased, or contracted by a school to transport students to or from school or a school-related activity, or on any public way within 1,000 feet of real property comprising any school. Upon receipt of the psychological evaluation, either the State or the defendant may request a change in the conditions of pretrial release, pursuant to Section 110-6 of this Code. The court may change the conditions of pretrial release to include a requirement that the defendant follow the recommendations of the psychological evaluation, including undergoing psychiatric treatment. The conclusions of the psychological evaluation and any statements elicited from the defendant during its administration are not admissible as evidence of guilt during the course of any trial on the charged offense, unless the defendant places his or her mental competency in issue.
    (b) Additional conditions of release shall be set only when it is determined that they are necessary to ensure the defendant's appearance in court, ensure the defendant does not commit any criminal offense, ensure the defendant complies with all conditions of pretrial release, prevent the defendant's unlawful interference with the orderly administration of justice, or ensure compliance with the rules and procedures of problem solving courts. However, conditions shall include the least restrictive means and be individualized. Conditions shall not mandate rehabilitative services unless directly tied to the risk of pretrial misconduct. Conditions of supervision shall not include punitive measures such as community service work or restitution. Conditions may include the following:
        (0.05) Not depart this State without leave of the
    
court;
        (1) Report to or appear in person before such person
    
or agency as the court may direct;
        (2) Refrain from possessing a firearm or other
    
dangerous weapon;
        (3) Refrain from approaching or communicating with
    
particular persons or classes of persons;
        (4) Refrain from going to certain described
    
geographic areas or premises;
        (5) Be placed under direct supervision of the
    
Pretrial Services Agency, Probation Department or Court Services Department in a pretrial home supervision capacity with or without the use of an approved electronic monitoring device subject to Article 8A of Chapter V of the Unified Code of Corrections;
        (6) For persons charged with violating Section 11-501
    
of the Illinois Vehicle Code, refrain from operating a motor vehicle not equipped with an ignition interlock device, as defined in Section 1-129.1 of the Illinois Vehicle Code, pursuant to the rules promulgated by the Secretary of State for the installation of ignition interlock devices. Under this condition the court may allow a defendant who is not self-employed to operate a vehicle owned by the defendant's employer that is not equipped with an ignition interlock device in the course and scope of the defendant's employment;
        (7) Comply with the terms and conditions of an order
    
of protection issued by the court under the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986 or an order of protection issued by the court of another state, tribe, or United States territory;
        (8) Sign a written admonishment requiring that he or
    
she comply with the provisions of Section 110-12 regarding any change in his or her address. The defendant's address shall at all times remain a matter of record with the clerk of the court; and
        (9) Such other reasonable conditions as the court may
    
impose, so long as these conditions are the least restrictive means to achieve the goals listed in subsection (b), are individualized, and are in accordance with national best practices as detailed in the Pretrial Supervision Standards of the Supreme Court.
    The defendant shall receive verbal and written notification of conditions of pretrial release and future court dates, including the date, time, and location of court.
    (c) When a person is charged with an offense under Section 11-1.20, 11-1.30, 11-1.40, 11-1.50, 11-1.60, 12-13, 12-14, 12-14.1, 12-15 or 12-16 of the Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012, involving a victim who is a minor under 18 years of age living in the same household with the defendant at the time of the offense, in releasing the defendant, the judge shall impose conditions to restrict the defendant's access to the victim which may include, but are not limited to conditions that he will:
        1. Vacate the household.
        2. Make payment of temporary support to his
    
dependents.
        3. Refrain from contact or communication with the
    
child victim, except as ordered by the court.
    (d) When a person is charged with a criminal offense and the victim is a family or household member as defined in Article 112A, conditions shall be imposed at the time of the defendant's release that restrict the defendant's access to the victim. Unless provided otherwise by the court, the restrictions shall include requirements that the defendant do the following:
        (1) refrain from contact or communication with the
    
victim for a minimum period of 72 hours following the defendant's release; and
        (2) refrain from entering or remaining at the
    
victim's residence for a minimum period of 72 hours following the defendant's release.
    (e) Local law enforcement agencies shall develop standardized pretrial release forms for use in cases involving family or household members as defined in Article 112A, including specific conditions of pretrial release as provided in subsection (d). Failure of any law enforcement department to develop or use those forms shall in no way limit the applicability and enforcement of subsections (d) and (f).
    (f) If the defendant is released after conviction following appeal or other post-conviction proceeding, the conditions of the pretrial release shall be that he will, in addition to the conditions set forth in subsections (a) and (b) hereof:
        (1) Duly prosecute his appeal;
        (2) Appear at such time and place as the court may
    
direct;
        (3) Not depart this State without leave of the court;
        (4) Comply with such other reasonable conditions as
    
the court may impose; and
        (5) If the judgment is affirmed or the cause reversed
    
and remanded for a new trial, forthwith surrender to the officer from whose custody he was released.
    (g) Upon a finding of guilty for any felony offense, the defendant shall physically surrender, at a time and place designated by the court, any and all firearms in his or her possession and his or her Firearm Owner's Identification Card as a condition of being released pending sentencing.
(Source: P.A. 101-138, eff. 1-1-20; 101-652, eff. 1-1-23; 102-1104, eff. 1-1-23.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 121 cases (112 in the last 5 years), 2010–2026 · leading case: People v. Stock, 2023 IL App (1st) 231753, 230 N.E.3d 197.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Stock, 2023 IL App (1st) 231753, 230 N.E.3d 197. · cites it 4× “725 ILCS 5/110-10(a) (West 2022). Section 110-10(b) then provides a number of discretionary conditions that the trial court may impose, which include but are not limited to (1) restrictions on leaving Illinois without leave of court, (2) prohibitions on possessing firearms or…”
People v. Casas, 2017 IL 120797, 104 N.E.3d 425. · cites it 3× “Also of significance is another condition of bail bond, which is to "[a]ppear to answer the charge in the court having jurisdiction on a day certain and thereafter as ordered by the court until discharged or final order of the court.”
People v. Inman, 2023 IL App (4th) 230864, 242 N.E.3d 978. “1(e)(2) (West 2022)), (3) no conditions or combination of conditions under subsection 110-10(b) of the Code (725 ILCS 5/110-10(b) (West 2022)) could mitigate the real and present threat (see 725 ILCS 5/110-6.”
People v. Trottier, 2023 IL App (2d) 230317, 242 N.E.3d 1025. “Defendant lists the mandatory conditions imposed by section 110-10 of the Code (725 ILCS 5/110- 10(a)(1)-(6) (West 2022)) as well as the additional conditions permissible under the same section (725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(0.05)-(9) (West 2022)).”
People v. Herrera, 2023 IL App (1st) 231801-B, 244 N.E.3d 275. · cites it 2× “” 725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(5) (West 2022); compare 725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(14) (West 2020) (pre-SAFE-T Act provision).”
People v. Mikolaitis, 2024 IL 130693, 266 N.E.3d 697. · cites it 2× “¶ 26 (citing 725 ILCS 5/110-10 (West 2022)). Thus, the dissent determined the “plain language of section 110-6.”
People v. Swan, 2023 IL App (5th) 230766, 235 N.E.3d 119. “1(a) of the Code; and that “no condition or combination of conditions set forth in 725 ILCS 5/110-10” could mitigate the real and present threat to the safety of the community, based upon the specific articulable facts of the case.”
People v. Morgan, 2024 IL App (4th) 240103, 238 N.E.3d 597. “See 725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(9) (West 2022). We cannot expect the State to specifically raise and argue against every possible condition of release in every case; there must be some limiting principle.”
People v. Witherspoon, 2019 IL 123092, 129 N.E.3d 1208. · cites it 2× “, 725 ILCS 5/110-10(d)(2) (West 2014) (conditions of bond); 750 ILCS 60/214(b)(2) (West 2014) (orders of protection).”
People v. Frank-mccarron, 934 N.E.2d 76 (Ill. App. Ct. 3d Dist. 2010). · cites it 2× “Rather, the defendant had been ordered to wear the EMD as a condition of her bond, an order firmly within the court's discretion (725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(14) (West 2006)). Without more, there was no error in ordering the defendant to wear an EMD as a condition of her bond.”
People v. Parker, 2024 IL App (1st) 232164, 238 N.E.3d 508. “” Last, the State alleged that there was “[n]o condition or combination of conditions set forth in 725 ILCS 5/110-10(b) *** to mitigate that risk.”
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (2d) 120094. · cites it 2× “725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(14.3) (West 2008). ¶ 33 Here, the trial court set defendant’s bond at $250,000 and ordered, as a condition of the bond, that he be supervised by pretrial bond services and pay a $75 fee.”
Show all 121 citing cases →
725 ILCS 5/110-10(5): 1 case
People v. Barnes, 2024 IL App (1st) 240475-U.
725 ILCS 5/110-10(a): 14 cases
People v. Stock, 2023 IL App (1st) 231753, 230 N.E.3d 197. “725 ILCS 5/110-10(a) (West 2022). Section 110-10(b) then provides a number of discretionary conditions that the trial court may impose, which include but are not limited to (1) restrictions on leaving Illinois without leave of court, (2) prohibitions on possessing firearms or…”
People v. Schulz, 2024 IL App (1st) 240422, 255 N.E.3d 341.
People v. Collins, 2024 IL App (2d) 230577-U.
People v. Reamy, 2024 IL App (2d) 240084-U.
People v. Gonzalez, 2024 IL App (2d) 230593-U.
725 ILCS 5/110-10(a)(1): 5 cases
People v. Casas, 2017 IL 120797, 104 N.E.3d 425. “Also of significance is another condition of bail bond, which is to "[a]ppear to answer the charge in the court having jurisdiction on a day certain and thereafter as ordered by the court until discharged or final order of the court.”
People v. Casas, 2016 IL App (2d) 150456, 59 N.E.3d 785.
People v. Casas, 2016 IL App (2d) 150456.
People v. Trottier, 2023 IL App (2d) 230317.
People v. Casas, 2017 IL 120797.
725 ILCS 5/110-10(a)(2): 2 cases
People v. Casas, 2017 IL 120797, 104 N.E.3d 425. “Also of significance is another condition of bail bond, which is to "[a]ppear to answer the charge in the court having jurisdiction on a day certain and thereafter as ordered by the court until discharged or final order of the court.”
People v. Casas, 2017 IL 120797.
725 ILCS 5/110-10(a)(4): 6 cases
People v. Hammerand, 2024 IL App (2d) 240500, 260 N.E.3d 848.
People v. Henley, 2023 IL App (4th) 230803-U.
People v. Burgos, 2024 IL App (1st) 232121-U.
People v. Williams, 2024 IL App (1st) 240246-U.
People v. Lindemann, 2026 IL App (5th) 250820-U.
725 ILCS 5/110-10(a)(5): 2 cases
People v. Grayson, 2024 IL App (4th) 241100-U.
People v. Fultz, 2026 IL App (2d) 260031-U.
725 ILCS 5/110-10(a)(6): 1 case
People v. Perez, 2024 IL App (2d) 230416-U.
725 ILCS 5/110-10(b): 67 cases
People v. Stock, 2023 IL App (1st) 231753, 230 N.E.3d 197. “725 ILCS 5/110-10(a) (West 2022). Section 110-10(b) then provides a number of discretionary conditions that the trial court may impose, which include but are not limited to (1) restrictions on leaving Illinois without leave of court, (2) prohibitions on possessing firearms or…”
People v. Inman, 2023 IL App (4th) 230864, 242 N.E.3d 978. “1(e)(2) (West 2022)), (3) no conditions or combination of conditions under subsection 110-10(b) of the Code (725 ILCS 5/110-10(b) (West 2022)) could mitigate the real and present threat (see 725 ILCS 5/110-6.”
People v. Trottier, 2023 IL App (2d) 230317, 242 N.E.3d 1025. “Defendant lists the mandatory conditions imposed by section 110-10 of the Code (725 ILCS 5/110- 10(a)(1)-(6) (West 2022)) as well as the additional conditions permissible under the same section (725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(0.05)-(9) (West 2022)).”
People v. Parker, 2024 IL App (1st) 232164, 238 N.E.3d 508. “” Last, the State alleged that there was “[n]o condition or combination of conditions set forth in 725 ILCS 5/110-10(b) *** to mitigate that risk.”
People v. Mikolaitis, 2024 IL 130693, 266 N.E.3d 697. “¶ 26 (citing 725 ILCS 5/110-10 (West 2022)). Thus, the dissent determined the “plain language of section 110-6.”
725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(14): 7 cases
People v. Frank-mccarron, 934 N.E.2d 76 (Ill. App. Ct. 3d Dist. 2010). “Rather, the defendant had been ordered to wear the EMD as a condition of her bond, an order firmly within the court's discretion (725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(14) (West 2006)). Without more, there was no error in ordering the defendant to wear an EMD as a condition of her bond.”
People v. Herrera, 2023 IL App (1st) 231801-B, 244 N.E.3d 275. “” 725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(5) (West 2022); compare 725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(14) (West 2020) (pre-SAFE-T Act provision).”
People v. Williams, 2013 IL App (2d) 120094. “725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(14.3) (West 2008). ¶ 33 Here, the trial court set defendant’s bond at $250,000 and ordered, as a condition of the bond, that he be supervised by pretrial bond services and pay a $75 fee.”
People v. Lotz, 2023 IL App (2d) 220345-U.
People v. Stafford, 2025 IL App (2d) 240250, 272 N.E.3d 858.
725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(3): 4 cases
People v. Wiggins, 2024 IL App (4th) 240015-U.
People v. Keenan, 2024 IL App (4th) 230422-U.
People v. Yeager, 2026 IL App (3d) 260161-U.
People v. Jeanpierre, 2025 IL App (4th) 240462.
725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(4): 1 case
People v. Yeager, 2026 IL App (3d) 260161-U.
725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(5): 6 cases
People v. Herrera, 2023 IL App (1st) 231801-B, 244 N.E.3d 275. “” 725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(5) (West 2022); compare 725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(14) (West 2020) (pre-SAFE-T Act provision).”
People v. Wells, 2024 IL App (1st) 232453, 248 N.E.3d 451.
People v. Hood, 2024 IL App (1st) 232062-U.
People v. Hatch, 2025 IL App (4th) 241171-U.
People v. Phelps, 2025 IL App (1st) 251777-U.
725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(9): 7 cases
People v. Stock, 2023 IL App (1st) 231753, 230 N.E.3d 197. “725 ILCS 5/110-10(a) (West 2022). Section 110-10(b) then provides a number of discretionary conditions that the trial court may impose, which include but are not limited to (1) restrictions on leaving Illinois without leave of court, (2) prohibitions on possessing firearms or…”
People v. Morgan, 2024 IL App (4th) 240103, 238 N.E.3d 597. “See 725 ILCS 5/110-10(b)(9) (West 2022). We cannot expect the State to specifically raise and argue against every possible condition of release in every case; there must be some limiting principle.”
People v. Mikolaitis, 2024 IL App (3d) 230791, 238 N.E.3d 591.
People v. Riaz, 2023 IL App (1st) 231833-U.
People v. Wiggins, 2024 IL App (4th) 240015-U.
725 ILCS 5/110-10(d): 1 case
People v. Keenan, 2024 IL App (4th) 230422-U.
725 ILCS 5/110-10(d)(2): 2 cases
People v. Witherspoon, 2019 IL 123092, 129 N.E.3d 1208. “, 725 ILCS 5/110-10(d)(2) (West 2014) (conditions of bond); 750 ILCS 60/214(b)(2) (West 2014) (orders of protection).”
People v. Witherspoon, 2019 IL 123092.
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.