Illinois Compiled Statutes

725 ILCS 5/119-5 (2026)

(Repealed)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(725 ILCS 5/119-5) (from Ch. 38, par. 119-5)
    Sec. 119-5. (Repealed).
(Source: P.A. 93-379, eff. 7-24-03. Repealed by P.A. 103-51, eff. 1-1-24.)


 
    (725 ILCS 5/Art. 120 heading)
ARTICLE 120. APPEAL BY THE STATE

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 79 cases, 1995–2009 · leading case: People v. Pitsonbarger, 793 N.E.2d 609 (Ill. 2002).
People v. Pitsonbarger, 793 N.E.2d 609 (Ill. 2002). “725 ILCS 5/119-5 (West 2000). The clerk of this court shall send a certified copy of the mandate in this case to the Director of Corrections, to the warden of Tamms Correctional Center, and to the warden of the institution where petitioner is now confined.”
People v. Caffey, 792 N.E.2d 1163 (Ill. 2001). “725 ILCS 5/119-5 ( West 1998 ). The clerk of his court shall send a certified copy of the mandate in this case to the Director of Corrections, the warden of Tamms Correctional Center, and the warden of the institution where defendant is now confined.”
People v. Bannister, 902 N.E.2d 571 (Ill. 2008). “The clerk of this court shall send a certified copy of the mandate in this case to the Director of Corrections, the warden of Tamms Correctional Center, and the warden of the institution where defendant is now confined.”
People v. Edwards, 745 N.E.2d 1212 (Ill. 2001). “725 ILCS 5/119-5 ( West 1998 ). The clerk of this court shall send a certified copy of the mandate in this case to the Director of Corrections, to the warden of Tamms Correctional Center, and to the warden of the institution where the defendant is now confined.”
People v. Barrow, 749 N.E.2d 892 (Ill. 2001). “The clerk of this court is directed to enter an order setting Tuesday, May 15, 2001, as the date on which the sentence of death, entered in the circuit court of La Salle County, is to be carried out.”
People v. Simpson, 792 N.E.2d 265 (Ill. 2001). “The defendant shall be executed in a manner provided by law (725 ILCS 5/119-5 ( West 2000 )). The clerk of this court shall send a certified copy of the mandate in this case to the Director of Corrections, to the warden of Tamms Correctional Center, and to the warden of the…”
People v. Hall, 743 N.E.2d 521 (Ill. 2000). “The clerk of this court shall send a certified copy of the mandate in this case to the Director of Corrections, the warden of Tamms Correctional Center, and the warden of the institution where defendant is confined. Affirmed. Justice HEIPLE, specially concurring: I concur in the…”
People v. Kliner, 705 N.E.2d 850 (Ill. 1998). “725 ILCS 5/119-5 (West 1996). The clerk of this court shall send a certified copy of the mandate in this case to the Director of Corrections, the warden of Tamms Correctional Center, and the warden of the institution where defendant is confined.”
People v. Coleman, 794 N.E.2d 275 (Ill. 2002). “Defendant shall be executed in the manner provided by law (725 ILCS 5/119-5 (West 2000)). The clerk of this court shall send a certified copy of the mandate to the Director of Corrections, to the warden of Tamms Correctional Center, and to the warden of the institution where…”
People v. Runge, 917 N.E.2d 940 (Ill. 2009). “725 ILCS 5/119-5 (West 2006). The clerk of this court shall send a certified *987 copy of the mandate in this case to the Director of Corrections, the warden of Tamms Correctional Center, and the warden of the institution where defendant is confined.”
People v. Johnson, 794 N.E.2d 294 (Ill. 2002). “725 ILCS 5/119-5 (West 2000). The clerk of this court shall send a certified copy of the mandate in this case to the Director of Corrections, to the warden of Tamms Correctional Center, and to the warden of the institution where petitioner is now confined.”
People v. Peeples, 793 N.E.2d 641 (Ill. 2002). “725 ILCS 5/119-5 (West 2000). The clerk of this court shall send a certified copy of the mandate to the Director of Corrections, to the warden of Tamms Correctional Center, and to the warden of the institution where defendant is now confined.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.