ILCS » Chapter 730 · Act 166
Illinois Compiled Statutes

730 ILCS 166/1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(730 ILCS 166/1)
    Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Drug Court Treatment Act.
(Source: P.A. 92-58, eff. 1-1-02.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2004–2026 · leading case: People v. Wilson, 2016 IL App (1st) 141063 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Wilson, 2016 IL App (1st) 141063 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “Because Wilson's criminal history has been nonviolent and he acknowledges his drug problem and appears willing to undergo drug treatment, I would remand for a determination of his eligibility for participation in a drug court program under the Drug Court Treatment Act.”
City of Urbana v. Andrew N.B., 813 N.E.2d 132 (Ill. 2004). · cites it 2× “The dissent describes pretrial probation as "a consensual proceeding which anticipates the cessation of prosecution.”
People v. Wilson, 2016 IL App (1st) 141063 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “Because Wilson’s criminal history has been nonviolent and he acknowledges his drug problem and appears willing to undergo drug treatment, I would remand for a determination of his eligibility for participation in a drug court program under the Drug Court Treatment Act.”
People v. Anderson, 833 N.E.2d 390 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). “On May 10, 2002, the trial court ordered defendant to participate in the drug-court program pursuant to the Drug Court Treatment Act (Drug Court Act) (730 ILCS 166/1 through 35 (West 2002)). On May 17, 2002, defendant signed a drug-court-participation agreement, indicating that…”
In re J.C., 2024 IL App (4th) 240747 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “Respondent cites the Problem-Solving Courts Standards manual promulgated by the Illinois Supreme Court pursuant to the Drug Court Treatment Act (730 ILCS 166/1 et seq. (West 2022)). The State argues respondent forfeited this issue by failing to object to the testimony of Carlton…”
People v. Anderson, 874 N.E.2d 77 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “In May 2002, the trial court granted defendant’s request to participate in counseling under the Drug Court Treatment Act (730 ILCS 166/1 through 35 (West 2002)) in exchange for (1) defendant’s jury-trial waiver and (2) his stipulation to the evidence that could be considered at…”
People v. Seidelman, 2022 IL App (4th) 210340-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “However, as the State points out in its brief, defendant’s argument goes against the purpose for enacting the Drug Court Treatment Act (730 ILCS 166/1 to 50 (West 2018)), which is to “reduce the incidence of drug use, drug addiction, and crimes committed as a result of drug use…”
In re L.H., 2022 IL App (2d) 220203-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “See 730 ILCS 166/1 et seq. (West 2020). ¶ 13 On March 8, 2022, the State petitioned to terminate respondent’s parental rights.”
In re A.K., 2022 IL App (2d) 220202-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “See 730 ILCS 166/1 et seq. (West 2020). ¶ 13 On March 8, 2022, the State petitioned to terminate respondent’s parental rights.”
People v. Rowlett, 2023 IL App (3d) 220309-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “Under the Drug Court Treatment Act (Act) (730 ILCS 166/1 et seq. (West 2022)), the drug court program is a special form of probation that facilitates an “intensive therapeutic treatment to *** assist participants with substance use disorders in making positive lifestyle changes…”
People v. Shaw, 2026 IL App (4th) 250645-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2026). “Defendant maintains that her sentences were “greatly at variance with the spirit and purpose of the law” because the Drug Court Treatment Act (730 ILCS 166/1 et seq. (West 2024)) reflects a policy that treatment is preferred over incarceration for individuals with substance use…”
City of Urbana v. Andrew N.B. (Ill. 2004). “The dissent describes pretrial probation as “a consensual proceeding which anticipates the cessation of prosecution.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.