ILCS » Chapter 740 · Act 21
Illinois Compiled Statutes

740 ILCS 21/125 (2026)

Violation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(740 ILCS 21/125)
    Sec. 125. Violation. An initial knowing violation of a stalking no contact order is a Class A misdemeanor. A second or subsequent knowing violation is a Class 4 felony.
(Source: P.A. 96-246, eff. 1-1-10.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2019–2025 · leading case: People v. Panozzo, 2022 IL App (3d) 190499 (Ill. App. Ct. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Panozzo, 2022 IL App (3d) 190499 (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “” 740 ILCS 21/125 (West 2012). Defendant argues that the trial court erred in allowing the State to introduce evidence of his guilt of offenses not contemplated by the charging instrument, resulting in the introduction of unduly prejudicial other crimes evidence.”
People v. Mitchell, 2021 IL App (2d) 200243-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). · cites it 2× “Mitchell, was convicted of violating a stalking no- contact order (740 ILCS 21/125 (West 2016)). On appeal, she contends that she was not proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
People v. Jefferson, 2024 IL App (4th) 230239-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). · cites it 2× “Charges ¶5 In July 2022, the State charged defendant with two counts of violation of a stalking no contact order (740 ILCS 21/125 (West 2022)). In support of the charges, the State alleged, on July 18, 2022, defendant, having been previously served with notice of a stalking no…”
People v. Mitchell, 2020 IL App (2d) 180158-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). · cites it 2× “INTRODUCTION ¶3 Following a jury trial in the circuit court of Kendall County, defendant, Sharon Mitchell, was convicted of one count of violating a no-contact order (740 ILCS 21/125 (West 2016)). She was sentenced to 24-months’ probation.”
Levan Galleries LLC v. City of Chicago (7th Cir. 2020). “Yet unlike a formal protective order, which carries criminal penalties for its violation, see 740 ILCS 21/125, a police report has no legal effect whatsoever.”
Levan Galleries LLC v. City of Chicago (7th Cir. 2020). “Yet unlike a formal protective order, which carries criminal penalties for its violation, see 740 ILCS 21/125, a police report has no legal effect whatsoever.”
People v. Greenfield, 2021 IL App (1st) 161771-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2021). “Greenfield with violation of a stalking/no contact order (740 ILCS 21/125 (West 2014)) and harassment through electronic means (720 ILCS 5/26.”
People v. Bourdage, 2023 IL App (1st) 211028-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “See 740 ILCS 21/125 (prohibiting “knowing violation of a stalking no contact order”).”
Leber v. Buzbee-Stiles (S.D. Ill. 2019). “740 ILCS 21/50; see 740 ILCS 21/10 (in the definition of “stalking,” referring to the stalker as “he or she”); 740 ILCS 21/95(b) (referring to respondent as “he or she”); 740 ILCS 21/110(b)(5) (same); 740 ILCS 21/125 (setting forth criminal penalties for violating a stalking no…”
People v. Smith, 2025 IL App (5th) 241024-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2025). “20-CM-288 of four counts of unlawful violation of a stalking no contact order (740 ILCS 21/125 (West 2020), 720 ILCS 5/12-3.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.