Illinois Compiled Statutes
740 ILCS 21/85 (2026)
Mutual stalking no contact orders are prohibited
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(740 ILCS 21/85)
Sec. 85. Mutual stalking no contact orders are prohibited. Correlative separate orders undermine the purposes of this Act. If separate orders are sought, both must comply with all provisions of this Act.
(Source: P.A. 96-246, eff. 1-1-10.) Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2015–2024 · leading case: Piester v. Escobar, 2015 IL App (3d) 140457 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015).
Piester v. Escobar, 2015 IL App (3d) 140457 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “See 740 ILCS 21/85 (West 2012). Escobar also argued that the plenary stalking no contact order against her interfered with her ability to pick up her daughter from the father’s home, where Piester also lived.”
Piester v. Escobar, 2015 IL App (3d) 140457 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “See 740 ILCS 21/85 (West 2012). Escobar also argued that the plenary stalking no contact order against her interfered with her ability to pick up her daughter from the father’s home, where Piester also lived.”
Ewing v. Gagliardo, 2022 IL App (4th) 200465-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2022). “The Gagliardos rightly acknowledge they cannot receive a reciprocal stalking no contact order against Ewing because the Act provides: “Mutual stalking no contact orders are prohibited.”
Vicary v. Windish, 2024 IL App (4th) 230760-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “” 740 ILCS 21/85 (West 2022). Again, however, petitioner has failed to cite any portion of the appellate record to support his factual assertion that the trial court entered mutual stalking no contact orders during the underlying proceedings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|