ILCS » Chapter 740 · Act 70
Illinois Compiled Statutes

740 ILCS 70/0.01 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(740 ILCS 70/0.01) (from Ch. 5, par. 1100)
    Sec. 0.01. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Farm Nuisance Suit Act.
(Source: P.A. 86-1324.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2023 · leading case: Johnson v. Compost Prods., Inc., 731 N.E.2d 948 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Johnson v. Compost Prods., Inc., 731 N.E.2d 948 (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “In January 1998 defendant moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to section 2 — 619(a)(9) of the Code (735 ILCS 5/2 — 619(a)(9) (West 1998)), alleging that plaintiffs’ cause of action was barred by the Farm Nuisance Suit Act (740 ILCS 70/0.01 et seq. (West 1998)). In…”
Vill. of Chadwick v. Nelson, 2017 IL App (2d) 170064 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “Because enforcement of the ordinance was preempted by the Farm Nuisance Suit Act ( 740 ILCS 70/0.01 et seq. (West 2016)), we reverse the conviction.”
Vill. of Chadwick v. Nelson, 2017 IL App (2d) 170064 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “Because enforcement of the ordinance was preempted by the Farm Nuisance Suit Act (Act) (740 ILCS 70/0.01 et seq. (West 2016)), we reverse the conviction.”
Marsh v. Middleton, 2023 IL App (4th) 230094-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “In the opening paragraph of the complaint, plaintiffs alleged defendants breached the standard of care by failing to warn of the risks of liability for attorney fees under the Illinois Farm Nuisance Suit Act (Farm Act) (740 ILCS 70/0.01 et seq. (West 2014)), encouraging…”
Johnson v. Compost Prods., Inc. (Ill. App. Ct. 2000). “In January 1998 defendant moved to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint pursuant to section 2--619(a)(9) of the Code (735 ILCS 5/2--619(a)(9) (West 1998)), alleging that plaintiffs' cause of action was barred by the Farm Nuisance Suit Act (740 ILCS 70/0.01 et seq. (West 1998)). In May…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.