ILCS » Chapter 750 · Act 22
Illinois Compiled Statutes

750 ILCS 22/101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(750 ILCS 22/101) (was 750 ILCS 22/100)
    Sec. 101. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act.
(Source: P.A. 93-479, eff. 1-1-04, operative 7-1-04.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2002–2025 · leading case: In Re Marriage of Kohl, 778 N.E.2d 1169 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Marriage of Kohl, 778 N.E.2d 1169 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “750 ILCS 22/101 (West 1998). Citing section 606 of the Uniform Act (750 ILCS 22/606 (West 1998)), Rivka argues that Menahem was barred from contesting the validity or enforcement of the Israeli order in Illinois when he failed to request a hearing within 20 days of being…”
In Re Marriage of Vailas, 939 N.E.2d 565 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 2× “Respondent moved to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (750 ILCS 22/101 et seq. (West 2008)). The trial court found that it had jurisdiction and denied respondent’s motion.”
Dep't of Healthcare & Fam. Servs. Ex Rel. Heard v. Heard, 916 N.E.2d 61 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “A nonregistering party may seek to contest the validity or enforcement of a registered order for different reasons, including the lack of personal jurisdiction over the contesting party by the issuing tribunal. 750 ILCS 22/606, 607 (West 2008). The party contesting the validity…”
In re Marriage of Edelman, 2015 IL App (2d) 140847 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “He also filed a motion to dismiss the latter petition pursuant to Illinois’s version of the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (Family Support Act) (750 ILCS 22/101 et seq. (West 2012)), arguing that Melissa could not seek college expenses, because Connecticut law applied to…”
In re Parentage of Jade J., 2025 IL App (1st) 241803 (Ill. App. Ct. 2025). “Pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) (750 ILCS 22/101 et seq. (West 2008)), she filed a petition for child support in the circuit court of Cook County.”
In re Marriage of Edelman, 2015 IL App (2d) 140847 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “OPINION ¶1 In 2010, the circuit court of Lake County entered an agreed order enrolling a foreign judgment—the Connecticut judgment for dissolution of marriage between the petitioner, Melissa Edelman, and the respondent, John Preston—in Lake County, pursuant to Illinois’s version…”
In re Marriage of Vailas (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 2× “Respondent moved to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (750 ILCS 22/101 et seq. (West 2008)). The trial court found that it had jurisdiction and denied respondent's motion.”
Dep't of Healthcare & Fam. Servs. v. Price, 2020 IL App (1st) 191213-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “¶6 On April 12, 2019 IDHFS moved the circuit court for reconsideration of the March 13 order.”
Illinois Dep't of Healthcare & Fam. Servs. ex rel Hadameck v. Ocampo, 2025 IL App (1st) 241731-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2025). “1-24-1731 appeared on a limited scope basis and filed an objection to the order’s validity, claiming that the German court lacked personal jurisdiction over him because he lacked sufficient contacts with Germany to satisfy due process.”
In re Marriage of Edelman, 2015 IL App (2d) 140847 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “He also filed a motion to dismiss the latter petition pursuant to Illinois’s version of the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (Family Support Act) (750 ILCS 22/101 et seq. (West 2012)), arguing that Melissa could not seek college expenses, because Connecticut law applied to…”
In re Marriage of Kohl (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “750 ILCS 22/101 (West 1998). Citing section 606 of the Uniform Act (750 ILCS 22/606 (West 1998)), Rivka argues that Menahem was barred from contesting the validity or enforcement of the Israeli order in Illinois when he failed to request a hearing within 20 days of being…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.