Illinois Compiled Statutes
750 ILCS 46/615 (2026)
Consequences of declining genetic testing
✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(750 ILCS 46/615)
Sec. 615. Consequences of declining genetic testing. (a) Subject to the limitations of Section 401, an order for genetic testing is enforceable through a proceeding for adjudication of contempt. (b) If an individual whose parentage is being determined declines to submit to genetic testing ordered by the court or administrative agency, the court or administrative agency may adjudicate parentage contrary to the position of that individual. (c) Genetic testing of the woman or person who gave birth to the child is not a condition precedent to genetically testing the child and a person whose parentage is being determined. If the woman or person who gave birth to the child is unavailable or declines to submit to genetic testing, the court or administrative agency may order the genetic testing of the child and every person whose parentage is being adjudicated. (Source: P.A. 104-448, eff. 12-12-25.) Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2020–2020 · leading case: In re A.S., 2020 IL App (1st) 200616.
In re A.S., 2020 IL App (1st) 200616. “750 ILCS 46/615 (West 2016). However, while the statute indicates that a party can be held in contempt for refusing to comply and that the court may also adjudicate parentage against him, we do not find either provision to be mandatory, as the legislative use of such words is…”
750 ILCS 46/615(a): 1 case
In re A.S., 2020 IL App (1st) 200616. “750 ILCS 46/615 (West 2016). However, while the statute indicates that a party can be held in contempt for refusing to comply and that the court may also adjudicate parentage against him, we do not find either provision to be mandatory, as the legislative use of such words is…”
750 ILCS 46/615(b): 1 case
In re A.S., 2020 IL App (1st) 200616. “750 ILCS 46/615 (West 2016). However, while the statute indicates that a party can be held in contempt for refusing to comply and that the court may also adjudicate parentage against him, we do not find either provision to be mandatory, as the legislative use of such words is…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|