ILCS » Chapter 755 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

755 ILCS 5/18-2 (2026)

Claim form

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(755 ILCS 5/18-2) (from Ch. 110 1/2, par. 18-2)
    Sec. 18-2. Claim form.) Every claim filed must be in writing and state sufficient information to notify the representative of the nature of the claim or other relief sought.
(Source: P.A. 81-213.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2014–2023 · leading case: Craig v. Zink, 2016 IL App (4th) 150939 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Craig v. Zink, 2016 IL App (4th) 150939 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2× “” Section 18-5(a) of the Probate Act (755 ILCS 5/18-5(a) (West 2014)) provides: “The representative or any other person whose rights may be affected by the allowance of a claim or counterclaim may file pleadings with the clerk of the court within 30 days after mailing or…”
Craig v. Zink, 2016 IL App (4th) 150939 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 3× “As to his response to the Estate’s motion to dismiss, Zink asserted (1) section 18-2 of the Probate Act of 1975 (Probate Act) (755 ILCS 5/18-2 (West 2014)) did not require formal pleading in presenting a claim, (2) his written claim provided sufficient information to notify the…”
Berkowitz v. Urso, 2014 IL App (1st) 121662 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “, the renting of the property, was not unenforceable based on a fraudulent or improper purpose, was not barred by the statute of frauds, was not void based on public policy, or was not barred by the Probate Act of 1975 (Probate Act) (755 ILCS 5/18-2, 18-3 (West 1998)). Based on…”
In re Est. of Spitler, 2023 IL App (5th) 220361-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). “755 ILCS 5/18-2 (West 2018). The time limit for filing a claim may be provided in the notice or in a publication and the date shall not be less than six months from the date of the first publication or three months from the date of mailing or delivery, whichever is later.”
Berkowitz v. Urso, 2014 IL App (1st) 121662 (Ill. App. Ct. 2015). “, the renting of the property, was not unenforceable based on a fraudulent or improper purpose, was not barred by the statute of frauds, was not void based on public policy, or was not barred by the Probate Act of 1975 (Probate Act) (755 ILCS 5/18-2, 18-3 (West 1998)). Based on…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.