Illinois Compiled Statutes

755 ILCS 65/1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(755 ILCS 65/1)
    Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Disposition of Remains Act.
(Source: P.A. 94-561, eff. 1-1-06.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2011–2021 · leading case: Carlson v. Glueckert Funeral Home, Ltd., 943 N.E.2d 237 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011).
Carlson v. Glueckert Funeral Home, Ltd., 943 N.E.2d 237 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “The circuit court involuntarily dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to defendants’ motion, ruling, inter alia, that as a matter of law defendants were shielded from liability under the Illinois Disposition of Remains Act (755 ILCS 65/1 et seq. (West 2008)) (the Act).”
Kramer v. Koeller (C.D. Ill. 2020). “Koeller alleges that as Executor he had the first priority right to handle the disposition of the Remains, pursuant to the Illinois Disposition of Remains Act (Act), 755 ILCS 65/1 et seq. He alleges the Remains were cremated.”
Kramer v. Koeller (C.D. Ill. 2021). “Counterclaim I Koeller seeks summary judgment on his claim that Rachel Kramer violated the Illinois Disposition of Remains Act (Act), 755 ILCS 65/1 et seq., when she took Barbara Kramer’s remains to her home in Cincinnati, Ohio.”
Carlson v. Glueckert Funeral (Ill. App. Ct. 2011). “The circuit court involuntarily dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to defendants’ motion, ruling, inter alia, that as a matter of law defendants were shielded from liability under the Illinois Disposition of Remains Act (755 ILCS 65/1 et seq. (West 2008)) (the Act).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.