Illinois Compiled Statutes
765 ILCS 1075/60 (2026)
Rights and remedies
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(765 ILCS 1075/60)
Sec. 60.
Rights and remedies.
The rights and remedies provided for in this Act are meant to supplant those
available under the common law as of the effective date of this Act,
but do not affect an individual's common law rights as they existed
before the effective date of this Act. Except for the common law right of
publicity, the rights and remedies provided under this Act are supplemental to
any other rights and remedies provided by law including, but not limited to,
the common law right of privacy.
(Source: P.A. 90-747, eff. 1-1-99.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 2006–2019 · leading case: Blair v. Nevada Landing P'ship, RBG, LP, 859 N.E.2d 1188 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006).
Blair v. Nevada Landing P'ship, RBG, LP, 859 N.E.2d 1188 (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “See 765 ILCS 1075/60 (West 2002). Specifically, the Right of Publicity Act sets forth: “The rights and remedies provided for in this Act are meant to supplant those available under the common law as of the effective date of this Act, but do not affect an individual’s common law…”
Christine Dancel v. Groupon, Inc., 949 F.3d 999 (7th Cir. 2019). “765 ILCS 1075/60; Trannel, 987 N.E.2d at 928 .”
Flentye v. Kathrein, 485 F. Supp. 2d 903 (N.D. Ill. 2007). “2d at 1192 (citing 765 ILCS 1075/60); accord Brady Publ’g, 2002 WL 1400345 , at *3.”
Blair v. Nevada Landing P'ship (Ill. App. Ct. 2006). “See 765 ILCS 1075/60 (West 2002). Specifically, the Right of Publicity Act sets forth: "The rights and remedies provided for in this Act are meant to supplant those available under the common law as of the effective date of this Act, but do not affect an individual's common law…”
Christine Dancel v. Groupon, Inc. (7th Cir. 2019). “765 ILCS 1075/60; Trannel, 987 N.E.2d at 928 .”
Christine Dancel v. Groupon, Inc. (7th Cir. 2019). “765 ILCS 1075/60; Trannel, 987 N.E.2d at 928 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.