Illinois Compiled Statutes
765 ILCS 130/3 (2026)
When 2 or more persons have lands adjoining, each of them shall make and maintain a just proportion of the division fence between them, and if such fence shall be a hedge fence, then the owner or owners of such hedge fence shall, during the year after such hedge has attained the age of 7 years, cut back or trim such hedge fence to a height not to exceed 4 feet, and shall at least once in every 2 years thereafter, cut back or trim such hedge fence to the height of 5 feet
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IL-ILGAilga.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(765 ILCS 130/3)
(from Ch. 54, par. 3)
Sec. 3.
When 2 or more persons have lands adjoining, each of them shall
make and maintain a just proportion of the division fence between them, and
if such fence shall be a hedge fence, then the owner or owners of such
hedge fence shall, during the year after such hedge has attained the age of
7 years, cut back or trim such hedge fence to a height not to exceed 4
feet, and shall at least once in every 2 years thereafter, cut back or trim
such hedge fence to the height of 5 feet. The provisions of this section
shall not apply to any hedge fence protecting either an orchard, buildings
or wind break, nor shall the provisions of this Section apply to any such
fence for the preservation of wildlife and protection against soil erosion.
Such hedge fences protecting wildlife, or orchards, or buildings or
windbreaks, and such fences protecting against soil erosion shall not
exceed 60 rods in length. If the owner or owners of such hedge fence shall
fail or refuse to comply with the provisions of this act, on or before the
15th day of June in the year that such hedge should be cut or trimmed, any
one of the owners of such division fence having complied with the
provisions of this act may give the owner or owners, or their agents, of
any such uncut or untrimmed hedge, 10 days notice, in writing to cut or
trim such hedge. And should the owner or owners, or their agents so
notified fail or refuse to comply with such notice it shall be lawful for
the person giving the notice to cut or trim or cause to be cut or trimmed,
in accordance with law, and the cost and damage of cutting or trimming such
hedge may be recovered off of the owner or owners of such hedge before any
court of competent jurisdiction.
(Source: Laws 1965, p. 3536.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1995–2020 · leading case: Raab v. Frank, 2019 IL 124641 (Ill. 2019).
Raab v. Frank, 2019 IL 124641 (Ill. 2019). “Frank filed a third- party complaint against the owners of the neighboring parcel of land, David and Virginia Grossen, seeking contribution pursuant to the Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Act (Contribution Act) (740 ILCS 100/2 (West 2010)) based on negligence, breach of duty under…”
Matter of Est. of Wallis, 659 N.E.2d 423 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). “) (765 ILCS 130/3 (West 1992).) Section 7 of the Act declares: "If disputes arise between the owners of adjoining lands concerning the proportion of fence to be made or maintained by either of them, such dispute may be settled by any two of the fence viewers of the town or…”
Raab v. Frank, 2019 IL App (2d) 171040 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “As amended, the complaint sought contribution based on theories of negligence, breach of duty under the Fence Act ( 765 ILCS 130/3 (West 2010) ), and breach of contract.”
Raab v. Frank, 2019 IL App (2d) 171040 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “As amended, the complaint sought contribution based on theories of negligence, breach of duty under the Fence Act (765 ILCS 130/3 (West 2010)), and breach of contract.”
Whitling v. Snyder, 276 Ill. App. 3d 1053 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995). “) (765 ILCS 130/3 (West 1992).) Section 7 of the Act declares: "If disputes arise between the owners of adjoining lands concerning the proportion of fence to be made or maintained by either of them, such dispute may be settled by any two of the fence viewers of the town or…”
Raab v. Frank, 2019 IL 124641 (Ill. 2020). “Frank filed a third-party complaint against the owners of the neighboring parcel of land, David and Virginia Grossen, seeking contribution pursuant to the Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Act (Contribution Act) (740 ILCS 100/2 (West 2010)) based on negligence, breach of duty under…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.
|