ILCS » Chapter 770 · Act 60
Illinois Compiled Statutes

770 ILCS 60/0.01 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(770 ILCS 60/0.01) (from Ch. 82, par. 0.01)
    Sec. 0.01. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Mechanics Lien Act.
(Source: P.A. 86-1324.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 66 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1993–2025 · leading case: MD Elec. Contractors, Inc. v. Abrams, 888 N.E.2d 54 (Ill. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
MD Elec. Contractors, Inc. v. Abrams, 888 N.E.2d 54 (Ill. 2008). · cites it 4× “However, in their brief to this court, defendants raise a second issue, *58 namely, whether subcontractors are able to recover in quantum meruit or any direct action outside the Mechanics Lien Act (770 ILCS 60/0.01 et seq. (West 2006)). As to the first issue, plaintiff maintains…”
Fandel v. Allen, 937 N.E.2d 1124 (Ill. App. Ct. 2010). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff, however, asserts that because the Home Repair Act does not provide individual homeowners *1127 with a private right of action to enforce violations of the Home Repair Act, defendant is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
Norman A. Koglin Assocs. v. Valenz Oro, Inc., 680 N.E.2d 283 (Ill. 1997). · cites it 2× “Koglin filed a complaint in the circuit court of Cook County to foreclose a mechanic’s lien under the Mechanics Lien Act (the Act) (770 ILCS 60/0.01 et seq. (West 1992)). Koglin named four defendants in the foreclosure action: Valenz, the tenant; La Salle National Bank (La…”
Mountbatten Sur. Co. v. Szabo Contracting, Inc., 812 N.E.2d 90 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “On this date, plaintiff also filed a motion for restitution against defendants on the basis that defendants had acted fraudulently and in violation of the Mechanics Lien Act (770 ILCS 60/0.01 et seq. (West 2002)) by obtaining funds from Du Page County with false contractor…”
Sloan Elec. v. Prof'l Realty & Dev. Corp., 819 N.E.2d 37 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). · cites it 2× “3, Sloan sought recovery under the Mechanics Lien Act (Act) (770 ILCS 60/0.01 et seq. (West 2000)) because the Act allows the award of attorney fees and costs (770 ILCS 60/17 (West 2000)).”
Peter J. Hartmann Co. v. Capitol Bank & Trust Co., 353 Ill. App. 3d 700 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “Count V alleged joint and several liability against all defendants under the Mechanics Lien Act (the Act) (770 ILCS 60/0.01 et seq. (West 2000)). Count VI alleged unjust enrichment, and count VII alleged breach of contract third-party beneficiary against Capitol Bank & Trust, as…”
Behl v. Gingerich, 920 N.E.2d 665 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part the trial court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion. Specifically, we hold that plaintiff substantially complied with the statutory requirements of the Act and was…”
A.W. Wendell & Sons, Inc. v. Qazi, 626 N.E.2d 280 (Ill. App. Ct. 1993). “On March 9, 1990, Wendell recorded a lien on the property under the Mechanics Lien Act (770 ILCS 60/0.01 et seq. (West 1992)) in the circuit court of Du Page County for the nonpayment of $149,288.”
John Isfan Constr., Inc. v. Longwood Towers, LLC, 2016 IL App (1st) 143211 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “3d 906, 914 (2009) (if a subcontractor has no contractual relationship with the property owner, its sole remedy against the owner is through the Mechanics Lien Act (770 ILCS 60/0.01 et seq. (West 2008))). Per the trial court’s direction, Isfan released the invalid mechanic’s…”
G.M. Fedorchak & Assocs., Inc. v. Chicago Title Land Trust Co., 822 N.E.2d 905 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). “Under the Mechanics Lien Act (770 ILCS 60/0.01 et seq. (West 2002)), an architect may obtain a mechanic’s lien upon real property for the amount due for architectural services.”
Crawford Supply Co. v. Schwartz, 919 N.E.2d 5 (Ill. App. Ct. 2009). “308(a) (purpose of an immediate, interlocutory appeal is solely to “ ‘materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation’ ”).”
Candice Co. Inc. v. Ricketts, 666 N.E.2d 722 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). “Based on these allegations and exhibits, the plaintiff asserted in the first count of its complaint that it was entitled to a mechanics lien against 1033 Marshall under the Mechanics Lien Act (770 ILCS 60/0.01 et seq. (West 1992)). It asked the judge for an accounting of the…”
Show all 66 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.