ILCS » Chapter 810 · Act 5
Illinois Compiled Statutes

810 ILCS 5/1-101 (2026)

Short Titles

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(810 ILCS 5/1-101) (from Ch. 26, par. 1-101)
    Sec. 1-101. Short Titles.
    (a) This Act may be cited as the Uniform Commercial Code.
    (b) This Article may be cited as Uniform Commercial Code - General Provisions.
(Source: P.A. 95-895, eff. 1-1-09.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 66 cases (16 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: Razor v. Hyundai Motor Am., 854 N.E.2d 607 (Ill. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Razor v. Hyundai Motor Am., 854 N.E.2d 607 (Ill. 2006). · cites it 2× “(2000)) and the Illinois Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) (810 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq. (West 2000)). The only issues raised concern the propriety of the *611 damages awarded to the plaintiff.”
Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd., 675 N.E.2d 584 (Ill. 1996). “1-94-1275 (unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23)), reinstating the counts alleging breach of express and implied warranty under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) (810 ILCS 5/1-101 (West 1994)) and the count alleging violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive…”
U.S. Bank Trust Nat'l Ass'n v. Junior, 2016 IL App (1st) 152109 (Ill. App. Ct. 2016). “¶9 On January 13, 2015, defendants filed a “Writ in the Nature of Discovery,” which set forth generalized statements citing to the Uniform Commercial Code (810 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq. (West 2014)) and the Truth in Lending Act ( 15 U.”
Accettura v. Vacationland, Inc., 2019 IL 124285 (Ill. 2019). “¶6 ANALYSIS ¶7 Although plaintiffs alleged several counts against defendant, the only issue on appeal to this court is whether plaintiffs could revoke acceptance of the RV under Illinois’s adoption of the UCC (810 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq. (West 2014)). The statute at issue, adopted…”
Mars, Inc. v. Heritage Builders of Effingham, Inc., 763 N.E.2d 428 (Ill. App. Ct. 2002). “This policy stems from the theory that tort law affords a remedy for losses occasioned by personal injuries or damage to one's property, but contract law and the Uniform Commercial Code (810 ILCS 5/1-101 through 1-209 (West 1996)) offer the appropriate remedy for economic losses…”
Workforce Solutions v. Urban Servs. of Am., Inc., 2012 IL App (1st) 111410 (Ill. App. Ct. 2012). “Urban asserted that Drader and HSBC filed financing statements pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) (810 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq. (West 2008)) evidencing that they were secured creditors.”
Tosado v. Miller, 720 N.E.2d 1075 (Ill. 1999). “Applying this traditional, well-established analysis to the cause at bar, it is clear that section 13-212(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure is the statute which is more specifically applicable.”
Union Tank Car Co. v. NuDevco Partners Holdings, LLC, 2019 IL App (1st) 172858 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “On appeal, NuDevco challenges the verdict, claiming the trial court erred by (i) concluding that Union Tank's cause of action was not governed by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) ( 810 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq . (West 2016) ), (ii) awarding Union Tank damages when Union Tank failed…”
Ron & Mark Ward, LLC v. Bank of Herrin, 2024 IL App (5th) 230274 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “Ron and Mark executed personal guarantees related to the note, and it was secured by, among other things, a blanket Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) (810 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq. (West 2020)) lien on the plaintiffs’ business assets, a mortgage on Mark’s home, and a mortgage on Ron’s…”
Voelker v. Porsche Cars North Am., Inc., 353 F.3d 516 (7th Cir. 2003). “Voelker appeals the dismissal of his claims under the Magnuson-Moss Act, Illinois Uniform Commercial Code ("UCC") (810 ILCS 5/1-101, et seq. ), the New Vehicle Buyer Protection Act (815 ILCS 380/1, et seq.”
Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB v. Herzog, 2024 IL App (1st) 221467 (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “Herzog also cites to Munao for the proposition that a sale must have been “commercially reasonable” to support a deficiency judgment.”
Lanxon v. Magnus, 694 N.E.2d 610 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “2d 1203, 1205 (1986) (section 13-212(a) more specifically applicable than the limitation period in the Uniform Commercial Code (810 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq. (West 1992)) because it applies only to a particular type of claim and the latter applies to all breaches of contracts for…”
Show all 66 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.