ILCS » Chapter 815 · Act 306
Illinois Compiled Statutes

815 ILCS 306/1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(815 ILCS 306/1)
    Sec. 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Automotive Repair Act.
(Source: P.A. 90-426, eff. 1-1-98.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2008–2026 · leading case: Jandeska v. Prairie Int'l Trucks, Inc., 893 N.E.2d 673 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jandeska v. Prairie Int'l Trucks, Inc., 893 N.E.2d 673 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “In June 2006, Prairie filed a motion to dismiss claiming the Automotive Repair Act (815 ILCS 306/1 through 85 (West 2004)) did not expressly or impliedly provide a cause of action in favor of Jandeska.”
Bush v. J&J transmissions, Inc., 2017 IL App (3d) 160254 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017). “On November 10, 2010, plaintiff filed a complaint in the circuit court of Kankakee County against defendants, alleging claims for replevin, injunctive relief, fraud in the inducement of a contract, violation of the Automotive Repair Act (815 ILCS 306/1 et seq. (West 2014)),…”
Montgomery v. Nostalgia Lane, Inc., 891 N.E.2d 994 (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “Count I alleges that defendant violated several provisions of the Automotive Repair Act (815 ILCS 306/1 et seq. (West 2006)) and that those violations are actionable under section 2Z of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Consumer Fraud Act) (815…”
Hart v. MD Racing, Inc. (Ill. App. Ct. 2026). · cites it 2× “¶3 Hart appeals, arguing the trial court erred by (1) failing to consider various provisions of the Automotive Repair Act (815 ILCS 306/1 et seq. (West 2022)) and (2) finding he did not meet his burden of proof when he showed that MD Racing performed repairs that were not listed…”
Bizness, Inc. v. Bacon, 2020 IL App (3d) 190305-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2020). “Bacon appeals, claiming that the judgment should be reversed because the body shop failed to establish a valid contract and the repair estimate did not satisfy the consumer protection requirements of the Automotive Repair Act (815 ILCS 306/1 et seq. (West 2016)). We affirm.”
Bogdan Rusnak & Express Auto Sales, Inc . v. Serv. Intermediate, Inc., 2024 IL App (1st) 231392-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2024). “In reliance on the oral 1 Plaintiffs also asserted claims for violation of the Automotive Repair Act (815 ILCS 306/1 (West 2022)) and negligence.”
Turner v. GAC Star Quality, Inc. (N.D. Ill. 2023). “They filed this suit asserting five claims against GAC: (I) violation of the Illinois Automotive Repair Act (“Repair Act”), 815 ILCS 306/1 et seq.; (II) negligence; (III) breach of the implied warranty of workmanlike performance; (IV) negligent misrepresentation; and (V)…”
Mobley v. Tramco Transmission, Inc., 2014 IL App (1st) 122123 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “(West 2010)), premised on alleged violations of the Automotive Repair Act (815 ILCS 306/1 et seq. (West 2008)). Plaintiffs also brought a claim against Tramco for common law conversion.”
Mobley v. Tramco Transmission, Inc., 2014 IL App (1st) 122123 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “(West 2010)), premised on alleged violations of the Automotive Repair Act (815 ILCS 306/1 et seq. (West 2008)). Plaintiffs also brought a claim against Tramco for common law conversion.”
Jandeska v. Prairie Int'l Trucks (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “In June 2006, Prairie filed a motion to dismiss claiming the Automo- tive Repair Act (815 ILCS 306/1 through 85 (West 2004)) did not expressly or impliedly provide a cause of action in favor of Jandeska.”
Montgomery v. Nostalgia Lane, Inc. (Ill. App. Ct. 2008). “Count I alleges that defendant violated several provisions of the Automotive Repair Act (815 ILCS 306/1 et seq. (West 2006)) and that those violations are actionable under section 2Z of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Consumer Fraud Act) (815…”
Mobley v. Tramco Transmission, Inc., 2014 IL App (1st) 122123 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). “(West 2010)), premised on alleged violations of the Automotive Repair Act (815 ILCS 306/1 et seq. (West 2008)). Plaintiffs also brought a claim against Tramco for common law conversion.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.