ILCS » Chapter 815 · Act 505
Illinois Compiled Statutes

815 ILCS 505/2W (2026)

No person shall, for compensation, perform any act or service to reduce radon or radon progeny unless that person has an objective basis to believe that the act or service performed will reduce radon or radon progeny as represented

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(815 ILCS 505/2W) (from Ch. 121 1/2, par. 262W)
    Sec. 2W. No person shall, for compensation, perform any act or service to reduce radon or radon progeny unless that person has an objective basis to believe that the act or service performed will reduce radon or radon progeny as represented. A person who violates this Section commits an unlawful practice within the meaning of this Act and is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. Any person who has been injured by a violation of this Section may maintain an action in circuit court for damages against any person who has committed such violation. The person injured shall be awarded 3 times the amount of actual damages resulting from that violation together with costs and reasonable attorney's fees.
(Source: P.A. 86-251.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2001–2001 · leading case: Yang v. City of Chicago, 745 N.E.2d 541 (Ill. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Yang v. City of Chicago, 745 N.E.2d 541 (Ill. 2001). “2(c) (West 1998); 735 ILCS 5/2 — 203(c) (West 1998); 740 ILCS 10/7(2) (West 1998); 740 ILCS 110/15 (West 1998); 745 ILCS 70/12 (West 1998); 775 ILCS 5/8B — 104 (West 1998); 815 ILCS 505/2W (West 1998); 815 ILCS 602/5 — 120 (West 1998); 815 ILCS 605/11 (West 1998); 815 ILCS…”
Yang v. City of Chicago (Ill. 2001). “2(c) (West 1998); 735 ILCS 5/2–203(c) (West 1998); 740 ILCS 10/7(2) (West 1998); 740 ILCS 110/15 (West 1998); 745 ILCS 70/12 (West 1998); 775 ILCS 5/8B–104 (West 1998); 815 ILCS 505/2W (West 1998); 815 ILCS 602/5–120 (West 1998); 815 ILCS 605/11 (West 1998); 815 ILCS 615/45…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.