ILCS » Chapter 820 · Act 120
Illinois Compiled Statutes

820 ILCS 120/0.01 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(820 ILCS 120/0.01) (from Ch. 48, par. 2250)
    Sec. 0.01. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Sales Representative Act.
(Source: P.A. 86-1324.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 1994–2026 · leading case: English Co. v. Nw. Envirocon, Inc., 663 N.E.2d 448 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
English Co. v. Nw. Envirocon, Inc., 663 N.E.2d 448 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). · cites it 2× “TEC wrote to NWE's counsel again on September 15, asserting TEC's right under the Sales Representative Act (820 ILCS 120/0.01 et seq. (West 1992)) to receive payment on all earned commissions within 13 days.”
Maher & Assocs., Inc. v. Quality Cabinets, 640 N.E.2d 1000 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994). “(now 820 ILCS 120/0.01 et seq. (West 1992)).) We reverse and remand for further proceedings.”
Rico Indus., Inc. v. TLC Grp., Inc., 2014 IL App (1st) 131522 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 2× “(West 2012); 820 ILCS 120/0.01 et seq. (West 2012). ¶2 TLC filed a motion pursuant to section 2-615 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure for judgment on the pleadings regarding whether the termination provision created a perpetual contract.”
Rico Indus., Inc. v. TLC Grp., Inc., 2018 IL App (1st) 172279 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “(West 2012) ); (4) in the alternative, violation of the Illinois Sales Representative Act (Illinois Act) ( 820 ILCS 120/0.01 et seq. (West 2012) ); and (5) in the alternative, quantum meruit .”
Yamada Corp. v. Yasuda Fire & Marine Ins., 712 N.E.2d 926 (Ill. App. Ct. 1999). “In Maher, the plaintiff relied on the Sales Representative Act (820 ILCS 120/0.01 et seq. (West 1992)), and section 2 of that act provided that “[a]ny provision in any contract between a sales representative and principal purporting to waive any of the provisions of this Act…”
Namur v. Habitat Co., 691 N.E.2d 782 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998). “1994) (section 13— 202 did not apply to Illinois Sales Representative Act (820 ILCS 120/ 0.01 (West 1994)), which did not impose an automatic figure for a statutory penalty).”
Dawson v. W. & H. Voortman, Ltd., 853 F. Supp. 1038 (N.D. Ill. 1994). “July 6, 1988) (attached as Exhibit C to defendant’s Motion to Dismiss). There, Judge Parsons held that plaintiff Dawson was not a sales representative within the meaning of the Illinois Sales Representative Act.”
Rico Indus., Inc. v. TLC Grp., Inc., 2014 IL App (1st) 131522 (Ill. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 2× “(West 2012); 820 ILCS 120/0.01 et seq. (West 2012). ¶2 TLC filed a motion pursuant to section 2-615 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure for judgment on the pleadings regarding whether the termination provision created a perpetual contract.”
Wilkinson Co. v. Krups North Am., Inc., 48 F. Supp. 2d 816 (N.D. Ill. 1999). · cites it 2× “§ 1962 , the common law, and the Illinois Sales Representative Act, 820 ILCS 120/0.01 et seq. [the “ISRA”]. Wilkinson requests a full accounting and payment of commissions and bonuses owed to it pursuant to the Agreement, as well as other relief.”
Clinton Imperial China, Inc. v. Lippert Mktg., Ltd., 878 N.E.2d 730 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “Marketing countersued for breach of contract, fraud, and violation of the Sales Representative Act (820 ILCS 120/ 0.01 et seq. (West 1998)). In the fraud count, Marketing alleged that Harris, as an officer of Potteries, falsely represented that Chef agreed to purchase 3.”
Dynamic Metal Indus., Inc. v. Larsen Mfg., LLC., 2023 IL App (1st) 230894-U (Ill. App. Ct. 2023). · cites it 5× “Dynamic earned commissions based on manufacturing parts sold on Larsen’s behalf to third parties. After Larsen terminated the agreement, Dynamic sued Larsen for breach of contract and a violation of the Illinois Sales No.”
Dawson v. W. & H. Voortman, Ltd., 864 F. Supp. 77 (N.D. Ill. 1994). “STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ISSUES ON COUNTS I & II Counts I and II are brought pursuant to the Illinois Sales Representative Act, 820 ILCS 120/0.01 et seq. Defendant argues under these counts that the Act is a statutory penalty, and so a two-year statute of limitations applies.”
Show all 28 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.