ILCS » Chapter 820 · Act 130
Illinois Compiled Statutes

820 ILCS 130/6 (2026)

Any officer, agent or representative of any public body who wilfully violates, or willfully fails to comply with, any of the provisions of this Act, and any contractor or subcontractor, and any officer, employee, or agent thereof, who as such officer, employee, or agent, has a duty to create, keep, maintain, or produce any record or document required by this Act to be created, kept, maintained, or produced who willfully fails to create, keep, maintain, or produce such record or document as or when required by this Act, is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IL-ILGAilga.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(820 ILCS 130/6) (from Ch. 48, par. 39s-6)
    Sec. 6. Any officer, agent or representative of any public body who wilfully violates, or willfully fails to comply with, any of the provisions of this Act, and any contractor or subcontractor, and any officer, employee, or agent thereof, who as such officer, employee, or agent, has a duty to create, keep, maintain, or produce any record or document required by this Act to be created, kept, maintained, or produced who willfully fails to create, keep, maintain, or produce such record or document as or when required by this Act, is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
    The Department of Labor shall inquire diligently as to any violation of this Act, shall institute actions for penalties herein prescribed, and shall enforce generally the provisions of this Act. The Attorney General shall prosecute such cases upon complaint by the Department or any interested person.
(Source: P.A. 97-571, eff. 1-1-12.)

    
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2001–2019 · leading case: Brandt Constr. Co. v. Ludwig, 878 N.E.2d 116 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Brandt Constr. Co. v. Ludwig, 878 N.E.2d 116 (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). · cites it 4× “820 ILCS 130/6, 11 (West 2004). "The Department shall also have a right of action on behalf of any individual who has a right of action under this Section.”
AEH Constr., Inc. v. Dep't of Labor, 743 N.E.2d 1102 (Ill. App. Ct. 2001). “(AEH), filed suit for declaratory judgment against the Illinois Department of Labor (Department) seeking a declaration that it was not in violation of the Illinois Prevailing Wage Act (Act) (820 ILCS 130/6, 11a (West 1998)). The Department filed a motion to dismiss on the…”
Cement Masons Pension Fund v. William A. Randolph, Inc., 832 N.E.2d 228 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). “” 820 ILCS 130/6 (West 1998). It is clear from the language of sections 5 and 6 that the individual entities enumerated are responsible for compliance with the provisions of section 5 and that they are each individually subject to the punishment described in section 6.”
People ex rel. Dep't of Labor v. Lion Constr., LLC, 2019 IL App (3d) 180080 (Ill. App. Ct. 2019). “” 820 ILCS 130/6 (West 2016). 2 In its amended complaint, the State alleged Lion was “an Indiana Corporation registered to do business in Illinois under the assumed name of Lion Construction 1, LLC.”
Brandt Consturction Co. v. Ludwig (Ill. App. Ct. 2007). “While we have already found that Brandt has set out a sufficient complaint for declaratory judgment, we note that the complaint, in also asking for injunctive relief, is silent as to an allegation of irreparable damage.”
Cement Masons Pension Fund v. William A. Randolph, Inc. (Ill. App. Ct. 2005). “" 820 ILCS 130/6 (West 1998). It is clear form the language of sections 5 and 6 that the individual entities enumerated are responsible for compliance with the provisions of section 5 and that they are each individually subject to the punishment described in section 6.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.