Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 10A.330 (2026)

Judgment by district court on award

✓ Iowa Code 2026 (laws through the 2025 session)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any party in interest may present a file-stamped copy of an order or decision of the commissioner, from which a timely petition for judicial review has not been filed or if judicial review has been filed, which has not had execution or enforcement stayed as provided in section 17A.19, subsection 5, or section 10A.322, subsection 2, or an order or decision of a deputy commissioner from which a timely appeal has not been taken within the agency and which has become final by the passage of time as provided by rule and section 17A.15, or an agreement for settlement approved by the commissioner, and all papers in connection therewith, to the district court where judicial review of the agency action may be commenced. The court shall render a decree or judgment and cause the clerk to notify the parties. The decree or judgment, in the absence of a petition for judicial review or if judicial review has been commenced, in the absence of a stay of execution or enforcement of the decision or order of the workers’ compensation commissioner as provided in section 17A.19, subsection 5, or section 10A.322, subsection 2, or in the absence of an act of any party which prevents a decision of a deputy workers’ compensation commissioner from becoming final, has the same effect and in all proceedings in relation thereto is the same as though rendered in a suit duly heard and determined by the court. [S13, §2477-m33; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §1465; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §86.42; 82 Acts, ch 1161, §25] 86 Acts, ch 1238, §51; 88 Acts, ch 1158, §15; 98 Acts, ch 1061, §11; 2003 Acts, ch 140, §4; 2017 Acts, ch 23, §22, 24; 2023 Acts, ch 19, §1477 C2024, §10A.330

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: H.D. Supply Mgmt., Inc. v. Kenneth E. Smith, 13 N.W.3d 284 (Iowa Ct. App. 2024).
H.D. Supply Mgmt., Inc. v. Kenneth E. Smith, 13 N.W.3d 284 (Iowa Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 4× “Accord Iowa Code § 10A.330 (2024). Smith contends that “[t]his case still presents a justiciable controversy,” explaining “[t]he gist is the fact that aspects of the original agency decision which were not appealed by [H.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.