Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 147.135 (2026)

Peer review committees — nonliability — records and reports privileged and confidential

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. A person shall not be civilly liable as a result of acts, omissions, or decisions made in connection with the person’s service on a peer review committee. However, such immunity from civil liability shall not apply if an act, omission, or decision is made with malice. 2. As used in this subsection, “peer review records” means all complaint files, investigation files, reports, and other investigative information relating to licensee discipline or professional competence in the possession of a peer review committee or an employee of a peer review committee. As used in this subsection, “peer review committee” does not include licensing boards. Peer review records are privileged and confidential, are not subject to discovery, subpoena, or other means of legal compulsion for release to a person other than an affected licensee or a peer review committee, and are not admissible in evidence in a judicial or administrative proceeding other than a proceeding involving licensee discipline or a proceeding brought by a licensee who is the subject of a peer review record and whose competence is at issue. A person shall not be liable as a result of filing a report or complaint with a peer review committee or providing information to such a committee, or for disclosure of privileged matter to a peer review committee. A person present at a meeting of a peer review committee shall not be permitted to testify as to the findings, recommendations, evaluations, or opinions of the peer review committee in any judicial or administrative proceeding other than a proceeding involving licensee discipline or a proceeding brought by a licensee who is the subject of a peer review committee meeting and whose competence is at issue. Information or documents discoverable from sources other than the peer review committee do not become nondiscoverable from the other sources merely because they are made available to or are in the possession of a peer review committee. However, such information relating to licensee discipline may be disclosed to an appropriate licensing authority in any jurisdiction in which the licensee is licensed or has applied for a license. If such information indicates a crime has been committed, the information shall be reported to the proper law enforcement agency. This subsection shall not preclude the discovery of the identification of witnesses or documents known to a peer review committee. Any final written decision and finding of fact by a licensing board in a disciplinary proceeding is a public record. Upon appeal by a licensee of a decision of a board, the entire case record shall be submitted to the reviewing court. In all cases where privileged and confidential information under this subsection becomes discoverable, admissible, or part of a court record the identity of an individual whose privilege has been involuntarily waived shall be withheld. 3. a. A full and confidential report concerning any final hospital disciplinary action approved by a hospital board of trustees that results in a limitation, suspension, or revocation of a physician’s privilege to practice for reasons relating to the physician’s professional

\n

Tue Dec 09 22:26:19 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 147 (85, 1) 35 GENERAL PROVISIONS, HEALTH-RELATED PROFESSIONS, §147.136A\n\ncompetence or concerning any voluntary surrender or limitation of privileges for reasons relating to professional competence shall be made to the board of medicine by the hospital administrator or chief of medical staff within ten days of such action. The board of medicine shall investigate the report and take appropriate action. These reports shall be privileged and confidential as though included in and subject to the requirements for peer review committee information in subsection 2. Persons making these reports and persons participating in resulting proceedings related to these reports shall be immune from civil liability with respect to the making of the report or participation in resulting proceedings. As used in this subsection, “physician” means a person licensed pursuant to chapter 148. b. Notwithstanding subsection 2, if the board of medicine conducts an investigation based on a complaint received or upon its own motion, a hospital pursuant to subpoena shall make available information and documents requested by the board, specifically including reports or descriptions of any complaints or incidents concerning an individual who is the subject of the board’s investigation, even though the information and documents are also kept for, are the subject of, or are being used in peer review by the hospital. However, the deliberations, testimony, decisions, conclusions, findings, recommendations, evaluations, work product, or opinions of a peer review committee or its members and those portions of any documents or records containing or revealing information relating thereto shall not be subject to the board’s request for information, subpoena, or other legal compulsion. All information and documents received by the board from a hospital under this section shall be confidential pursuant to section 272C.6, subsection 4. [C77, 79, 81, §147.135] 86 Acts, ch 1211, §14; 90 Acts, ch 1086, §7; 2007 Acts, ch 10, §82; 2009 Acts, ch 133, §51 Referred to in §139A.22, 147.1, 147A.23

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1986–2020 · leading case: Dennis L. Cawthorn v. Catholic Health Initiatives Iowa Corp. D/B/A Mercy Hosp. Med. Ctr., a Corp., 806 N.W.2d 282 (Iowa 2011).
Dennis L. Cawthorn v. Catholic Health Initiatives Iowa Corp. D/B/A Mercy Hosp. Med. Ctr., a Corp., 806 N.W.2d 282 (Iowa 2011). · cites it 8× “” On March 31, 2004, Mercy responded: This Request is objected to because it requires the production of documents which are subject to the “peer review” privilege in Iowa Code § 147.135 . Without waiving said objection, this defendant affirmatively states that it is named as a…”
Wells Dairy, Inc. v. Am. Indus. Refrigeration, Inc., 690 N.W.2d 38 (Iowa 2004). “For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the Wisconsin report is not protected from disclosure by either rule 1.”
Holland v. Muscatine Gen. Hosp., 971 F. Supp. 385 (S.D. Iowa 1997). · cites it 2× “Iowa Code § 147.135 (2). The statute does “not preclude the discovery of the identification of witnesses or documents known to a peer review committee.”
Hutchinson v. Smith Labs., Inc., 392 N.W.2d 139 (Iowa 1986). “42 (rendering certain morbidity and mortality tables inadmissible at trial); Iowa Code § 147.135 (1985) (immunizing peer review committee members from civil liability for “acts, omissions or decisions made in connection with the person’s service” on the committee); Iowa Code §…”
Fox v. Kramer, 994 P.2d 343 (Cal. 2000). “” ( Iowa Code § 147.135 , subd. (2), italics added.”
Est. of Blume v. Marian Health Ctr., 516 F.3d 705 (8th Cir. 2008). “The hospital raised numerous defenses to this action in the trial court, including an assertion that it was immune from suit under the hospital’s bylaws, under Iowa Code § 147.135 (1), and under the Health Care Quality Improvement Act, see 42 U.”
Roxanne Rieder & Tony Rieder v. David Segal, M.D., Theodore Donta, M.D., PH.D, E. Iowa Brain & Spine Surgery, PLLC, Radiology Consultants of Iowa, PLC & Mercy Hospitals, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, d/b/a Mercy Med. Ctr., Cedar Rapids, Iowa (Iowa Ct. App. 2020). “See Iowa Code § 147.135 (2) (2016) (“Peer review records are privileged and confidential, are not subject to discovery, subpoena, or other means of legal compulsion for release to a person other than an affected licensee or a peer review committee, and are not admissible in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.