Iowa Code » Chapter 2 — GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 2.13 (2026)

Issuance of warrants

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The director of the department of administrative services shall also issue to each officer and employee of the general assembly, during legislative sessions or interim periods, upon vouchers signed by the president, majority leader, and secretary of the senate or the speaker and chief clerk of the house, warrants for the amount due for services rendered. The warrants shall be paid out of any moneys in the treasury not otherwise appropriated. [C97, §15, 16; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §20; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, §2.21, 2.22; C71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §2.13] 86 Acts, ch 1244, §2; 90 Acts, ch 1223, §4; 2003 Acts, ch 145, §286

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1974–2016 · leading case: State v. Mullen, 216 N.W.2d 375 (Iowa 1974).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Mullen, 216 N.W.2d 375 (Iowa 1974). · cites it 2× “L.Rev. at 636, 654. Also articulating an objective test is the National Commissions Study Draft of a New Federal Criminal Code § 702 (1970).”
In the Matter of the Inquiry Concerning Joseph SEVCIK, Jud. Magistrate, First Jud. Dist., 877 N.W.2d 707 (Iowa 2016). “2013) (listing many possible abuses, including influencing judicial proceedings for self or others, evading traffic tickets, recommendation abuses, and testifying before a jury). As one judge described it, this rule covers any “judge who in any manner gratuitously interjects his…”
Amended June 21, 2016 in the Matter of the Inquiry Concerning Joseph Sevcik, Jud. Magistrate, First Jud. Dist.. On Application of the Iowa (Iowa 2016). “, Judicial Conduct and Ethics § 2.13, at 2-54 8 to -64 (5th ed. 2013) (listing many possible abuses, including influencing judicial proceedings for self or others, evading traffic tickets, recommendation abuses, and testifying before a jury).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.