Iowa Code » Chapter 2 — GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 2.7 (2026)

Officers — tenure

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The president of the senate and the speaker of the house of representatives shall hold their offices until the first day of the meeting of the next general assembly. All other officers elected by either house shall hold their offices for the same terms, unless sooner removed, except as may be otherwise provided by resolution or rules of the general assembly. [R60, §16; C73, §13; C97, §17; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §10; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, §2.6; C71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §2.7] 90 Acts, ch 1223, §1

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1972–2014 · leading case: State of Iowa v. Mark Daryl Becker, 818 N.W.2d 135 (Iowa 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Iowa v. Mark Daryl Becker, 818 N.W.2d 135 (Iowa 2012). · cites it 2× “LaFave, et al, Criminal Procedure, § 2.7(c), 685–713 (3d ed. 2007) (describing due process methodology).”
Pro Edge L.P. v. Gue, 377 F. Supp. 2d 694 (N.D. Iowa 2005). · cites it 6× “The authority conferred under this Section 2.7 shall be an agency coupled with an interest, and all authority conferred hereby is irrevocable and not subject to termination by the Selling Shareholders or any of them, or by operation of law, whether by the death or incapacity of…”
Pro Edge, L.P. v. Gue, 374 F. Supp. 2d 711 (N.D. Iowa 2005). · cites it 2× “The authority conferred under this Section 2.7 shall be an agency coupled with an interest, and all authority conferred hereby is irrevocable and not subject to termination by the Selling Shareholders or any of them, or by operation of law, whether by the death or incapacity of…”
State v. Liggins, 524 N.W.2d 181 (Iowa 1994). “, Substantive Criminal Law § 2.7(b) (1986); Annotation, Necessity of Proving Venue or Territorial Jurisdiction of Criminal Offense Beyond Reasonable Doubt, 67 A.”
Young v. Wells Fargo & Co., 671 F. Supp. 2d 1006 (S.D. Iowa 2009). “, 1 Newberg on Class Actions § 2.7 (4th ed. 2008) (‘Whether or not the named plaintiff who meets individual standing requirements may assert the rights of absent class members is neither a standing issue nor an Article III case or controversy issue but depends rather on meeting…”
Diean Sabin v. Ivan Ackerman, 846 N.W.2d 835 (Iowa 2014). “7; see also Kurtz § 2.7, at 59-63. When a conflict arises in estate administration, a lawyer should clarify the situation.”
In Re Marriage of Welsher, 274 N.W.2d 369 (Iowa 1979). “His failure to comply with the court order to support his children may be punished by contempt proceedings under § 598.”
Welke v. City of Devenport, 309 N.W.2d 450 (Iowa 1981). “James, The Law of Torts § 2.7 (1956). The finder acquired special property interests that were regarded as paramount to all but the owner.”
Green v. Advance Homes, Inc., 293 N.W.2d 204 (Iowa 1980). “We are unable to find substantial evidence in the record from which the trier of fact could conclude that the plaintiff did not have an adequate remedy at law.”
State v. Snyder, 203 N.W.2d 280 (Iowa 1972). · cites it 2× “Moreover, these other methods should result in a savings to the State in prison maintenance expenses sufficient to outweigh any increased cost of collecting the fine.”
Diean Sabin v. Ivan Ackerman (Iowa 2014). “7; see also 13 Kurtz § 2.7, at 59–63. When a conflict arises in estate administration, a lawyer should clarify the situation.”
— Iowa Code § 2.7(b) — 2 cases
State v. Liggins, 524 N.W.2d 181 (Iowa 1994). “, Substantive Criminal Law § 2.7(b) (1986); Annotation, Necessity of Proving Venue or Territorial Jurisdiction of Criminal Offense Beyond Reasonable Doubt, 67 A.”
State v. Snyder, 203 N.W.2d 280 (Iowa 1972). “Moreover, these other methods should result in a savings to the State in prison maintenance expenses sufficient to outweigh any increased cost of collecting the fine.”
— Iowa Code § 2.7(c) — 1 case
State of Iowa v. Mark Daryl Becker, 818 N.W.2d 135 (Iowa 2012). “LaFave, et al, Criminal Procedure, § 2.7(c), 685–713 (3d ed. 2007) (describing due process methodology).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.