Iowa Code » Chapter 2 — GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 2.8 (2026)

Oaths

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any member may administer oaths necessary in the course of business of the house of which that person is a member, and, while acting on a committee, in the course of business of such committee. [C51, §10; R60, §7; C73, §10; C97, §10; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §11; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, §2.7; C71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §2.8]

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1993–2017 · leading case: Hornick v. Owners Ins. Co., 511 N.W.2d 370 (Iowa 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hornick v. Owners Ins. Co., 511 N.W.2d 370 (Iowa 1993). “” The statutory requirement applies to all motor vehicle liability insurance policies delivered or issued for delivery in this state.”
State of Iowa v. Matthew Alan Onstad (Iowa Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “The court did not err in accepting the plea agreement because it substantially complied with the requirements of section 2.8(2)(b) and determined Onstad’s guilty plea was voluntary, intelligent, and supported by facts.”
State of Iowa v. Juan Alberto Flores (Iowa Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 3× “” Iowa Code § 2.8 (2)(b)(4). The State concedes “the district court failed to inform [Flores] of his ‘right to confront and cross-examine witnesses against’ him at trial, and that his trial counsel likely breached an essential duty by failing to object to the colloquy.”
Darryl Tyson, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa (Iowa Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “See Iowa Code § 2.8 (2)(b)(2) (2015) (requiring the court to inform a defendant of “[t]he mandatory minimum punishment, if any, and the maximum possible punishment provided by the statute defining the offense to which the plea is offered”).”
Iowa Code § 2.8(2)(b): 1 case
State of Iowa v. Matthew Alan Onstad (Iowa Ct. App. 2016). “The court did not err in accepting the plea agreement because it substantially complied with the requirements of section 2.8(2)(b) and determined Onstad’s guilty plea was voluntary, intelligent, and supported by facts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.