Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 216.10 (2026)

Unfair credit practices

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. It shall be an unfair or discriminatory practice for any:

a. Creditor to refuse to enter into a consumer credit transaction or impose finance charges or other terms or conditions more onerous than those regularly extended by that creditor to\n\nTue Dec 09 22:22:08 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 216 (47, 2) 13 OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS, §216.12\n\nconsumers of similar economic backgrounds because of age, color, creed, national origin, race, religion, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, physical disability, or familial status.

b. Person authorized or licensed to do business in this state pursuant to chapter 524, 533, 536, or 536A to refuse to loan or extend credit or to impose terms or conditions more onerous than those regularly extended to persons of similar economic backgrounds because of age, color, creed, national origin, race, religion, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, physical disability, or familial status.

c. Creditor to refuse to offer credit life or health and accident insurance because of color, creed, national origin, race, religion, marital status, age, physical disability, sex, sexual orientation, or familial status. Refusal by a creditor to offer credit life or health and accident insurance based upon the age or physical disability of the consumer shall not be an unfair or discriminatory practice if such denial is based solely upon bona fide underwriting considerations not prohibited by Title XIII, subtitle 1.

2. The provisions of this section shall not be construed by negative implication or otherwise to narrow or restrict any other provisions of this chapter. [C75, 77, §601A.9; C79, 81, §601A.10] 90 Acts, ch 1212, §1 C93, §216.10 2007 Acts, ch 191, §13; 2012 Acts, ch 1017, §57; 2025 Acts, ch 1, §21 Referred to in §216.2 For consumer discrimination and other unfair practices, see §507B.4 and 537.3311 Subsection 1, paragraphs a, b, and c amended \n

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2009–2019 · leading case: In re Fuelling, 601 B.R. 665 (Bankr. D. Iowa 2019).
In re Fuelling, 601 B.R. 665 (Bankr. D. Iowa 2019). · cites it 5× “Fuelling's disabilities would violate Iowa Code § 216.10 , Iowa's disability discrimination act.”
Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862 (Iowa 2009). “18A (“[Chapter 216] shall not be construed to allow marriage between persons of the same sex, in accordance with chapter 595.”
Katherine Varnum, Patricia Hyde, Dawn Barbouroske, Jennifer Barbouroske, Jason Morgan, Charles Swaggerty, David Twombley, Lawrence Hoch, William M. Musser, Otter Dreaming, Ingrid Olson, & Reva Evans Vs. Timothy J. Brien, In His Off. Capacities As The Polk Cnty. Recorder & Polk Cnty. Registrar (Iowa 2009). “19 Significantly, we do not construe Iowa Code chapter 216 to allow marriage between persons of the same sex, a construction expressly forbidden in the Iowa Code. See id. § 216.18A (“[Chapter 216] shall not be 19The legislature has further indicated the irrelevancy of sexual…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.