Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 229.30 (2026)

Orders of courts in other states

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A judgment or order of hospitalization or commitment by a court of competent jurisdiction of another state or the District of Columbia, under which any person is hospitalized or placed in a facility operated by the United States department of veterans affairs or another agency of the United States government, shall have the same force and effect with respect to that person while the person is in this state as the judgment or order would have if the person were in the jurisdiction of the court which issued it. That court shall be deemed to have retained jurisdiction of the person so hospitalized or placed for the purpose of inquiring into that person’s mental condition and the need for continued hospitalization or care and custody, as do courts in this state under section 229.28. Consent is hereby given to the application of the law of the state or district in which is situated the court which issued the judgment or order as regards authority of the chief officer of any facility, operated in this state by the United States department of veterans affairs or another agency of the United States government, to retain custody, transfer, place on convalescent leave or discharge the person so hospitalized or committed. [C27, 31, 35, §3562-b1; C39, §3562.1; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, §229.20; C77, 79, 81, §229.30] 2009 Acts, ch 26, §12

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2002–2013 · leading case: Sarachek v. Luana Sav. Bank (In re Agriprocessors, Inc.), 490 B.R. 852 (Bankr. D. Iowa 2013).
Sarachek v. Luana Sav. Bank (In re Agriprocessors, Inc.), 490 B.R. 852 (Bankr. D. Iowa 2013). · cites it 2× “CC Commentary Section 229.30(a)(9), IV FRRS ¶ 9-364-1. Accord, Bailey & Hagedorn, Brady on Bank Checks ¶ 25.”
Farm Credit Servs. of Am. v. Am. State Bank, 212 F. Supp. 2d 1034 (N.D. Iowa 2002). “The official commentary to Regulation CC explains the Federal Reserve Board’s rationale for treating a payable though bank, such as Wells Fargo here, as a paying bank: Under §§ 229.30 and 229.36(a), a bank designed as a payable-through bank or payable-at bank and to which the…”
Iowa Code § 229.30(a)(9): 1 case
Sarachek v. Luana Sav. Bank (In re Agriprocessors, Inc.), 490 B.R. 852 (Bankr. D. Iowa 2013). “CC Commentary Section 229.30(a)(9), IV FRRS ¶ 9-364-1. Accord, Bailey & Hagedorn, Brady on Bank Checks ¶ 25.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.