1. Any dispositional order entered by the court pursuant to section 232.52 shall remain in force for an indeterminate period or until the child becomes eighteen years of age unless otherwise specified by the court or unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of section 232.54. No dispositional order made under section 232.52, subsection 2, paragraph “e”, shall remain in force longer than the maximum possible duration of the sentence which may be imposed on an adult for the commission of the act which the child has been found by the court to have committed.
2. All dispositional orders entered prior to the child attaining the age of seventeen years shall automatically terminate when the child becomes eighteen years of age, except as provided in subsection 3. Dispositional orders entered subsequent to the child attaining the age of seventeen years and prior to the child’s eighteenth birthday shall automatically terminate one year and six months after the date of disposition. In the case of an adult within the jurisdiction of the court under the provisions of section 232.8, subsection 1, the dispositional order shall automatically terminate one year and six months after the last date upon which jurisdiction could attach.
3. A dispositional order entered prior to the child attaining the age of seventeen, for a child required to register as a sex offender pursuant to the provisions of chapter 692A, may be extended one year and six months beyond the date the child becomes eighteen years of age.
4. Notwithstanding section 233A.13, a child committed to the training school subsequent to the child attaining the age of seventeen years and prior to the child’s eighteenth birthday may be held at the school beyond the child’s eighteenth birthday pursuant to subsection 2 or 3, provided that the training school makes application to and receives permission from the committing court. This extension shall be for the purpose of completion by the child of a course of instruction established for the child pursuant to section 233A.4 and cannot extend for more than one year and six months beyond the date of disposition unless the duration of the dispositional order was extended pursuant to subsection 3.
5. a. Any person supervising but not having custody of the child pursuant to such an order shall file a written report with the court at least every six months concerning the status and progress of the child.
b. Any agency, facility, institution, or person to whom custody of the child has been transferred pursuant to such order shall file a written report with the court at least every six months concerning the status and progress of the child.
c. Any report prepared pursuant to this subsection shall be included in the record considered by the court in a permanency hearing conducted pursuant to section 232.58. [C73, §1653 – 1658; C97, §2708; S13, §254-a23, 2708; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §3639, 3649; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, §232.23, 232.30; C66, 71, 73, 75, §232.36, 232.37; C79, 81, §232.53; 82 Acts, ch 1209, §12] 84 Acts, ch 1166, §1; 2000 Acts, ch 1056, §2; 2001 Acts, ch 135, §8; 2009 Acts, ch 119, §34, 36 Referred to in §232.52A \n
Notes of Decisions
In the Interest of J.J.A., 580 N.W.2d 731 (Iowa 1998).
· cites it 13× “Iowa Code section 232.53 governs the duration of dispo-sitional orders.”
In the Interest of Rousselow, 341 N.W.2d 760 (Iowa 1983).
· cites it 4× “See Iowa Code §§ 232.53 (1)-(2). We have held that a juvenile's appeal is not mooted simply because he or she has reached the age of majority.”
In the Interest of T.D., 335 N.W.2d 638 (Iowa Ct. App. 1983).
· cites it 4× “Section 232.53(2) The Code: In the case of an adult within the jurisdiction of the court under the provisions of section 232.”
J.S.X. Through D.S.X. v. Foxhoven, 361 F. Supp. 3d 822 (S.D. Iowa 2019).
“CONCLUSION For the foregoing reason, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, [ECF No. 148], is GRANTED as to Count II. It is DENIED as to all other counts.”
State v. Duncan, 841 N.W.2d 604 (Iowa Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 2× “” Iowa Code § 232.53 (2). . In the order denying Duncan's rule 1.”
In the Interest of B.A., 737 N.W.2d 665 (Iowa Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 2× “Iowa Code section 232.53(2) provides that “all dispositional orders entered prior to the child attaining the age of seventeen shall automatically terminate when the child becomes eighteen years of age.”
In the Interest of M.M.C., 564 N.W.2d 9 (Iowa 1997).
“§ 232.53. IV. Disposition. The juvenile court properly considered the seriousness of the wrongful act, Mark's culpability, his age, and his prior record.”
In the Interest of J.H., Minor Child (Iowa Ct. App. 2020).
· cites it 7× “See Iowa Code § 232.53 (3).3 J.H. next argues the juvenile court’s early waivers of the sex offender registration requirement were “analogous to an acquittal,” rendering later imposition of the requirement a violation of his “right to be free from double jeopardy.”
James Steven Corder v. Rusty Rogerson, 192 F.3d 1165 (8th Cir. 1999).
“Finally, the juvenile court granted the State’s motion to waive its jurisdiction because any sentence imposed by that court would terminate on Corder’s eighteenth birthday, see Iowa Code § 232.53 , and therefore the juvenile justice system was “inadequate to deal with the…”
State of Iowa v. Dagger Le Erdman (Iowa Ct. App. 2023).
· cites it 6× “But the child’s counsel pointed out that under section 232.53(2), “[d]ispositional orders entered subsequent to the child attaining the age of seventeen years and prior to the child’s eighteenth birthday shall automatically terminate one year and six months after the date of…”
In Re Ba, 737 N.W.2d 665 (Iowa Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 2× “Iowa Code section 232.53(2) provides that "all dispositional orders entered prior to the child attaining the age of seventeen shall automatically terminate when the child becomes eighteen years of age.”
— Iowa Code § 232.53(1) — 1 case
In the Interest of J.J.A., 580 N.W.2d 731 (Iowa 1998).
“Iowa Code section 232.53 governs the duration of dispo-sitional orders.”
— Iowa Code § 232.53(2) — 8 cases
In the Interest of J.J.A., 580 N.W.2d 731 (Iowa 1998).
“Iowa Code section 232.53 governs the duration of dispo-sitional orders.”
In the Interest of T.D., 335 N.W.2d 638 (Iowa Ct. App. 1983).
“Section 232.53(2) The Code: In the case of an adult within the jurisdiction of the court under the provisions of section 232.”
In the Interest of B.A., 737 N.W.2d 665 (Iowa Ct. App. 2007).
“Iowa Code section 232.53(2) provides that “all dispositional orders entered prior to the child attaining the age of seventeen shall automatically terminate when the child becomes eighteen years of age.”
State of Iowa v. Dagger Le Erdman (Iowa Ct. App. 2023).
“But the child’s counsel pointed out that under section 232.53(2), “[d]ispositional orders entered subsequent to the child attaining the age of seventeen years and prior to the child’s eighteenth birthday shall automatically terminate one year and six months after the date of…”
In Re Ba, 737 N.W.2d 665 (Iowa Ct. App. 2007).
“Iowa Code section 232.53(2) provides that "all dispositional orders entered prior to the child attaining the age of seventeen shall automatically terminate when the child becomes eighteen years of age.”
— Iowa Code § 232.53(3) — 1 case
In the Interest of J.H., Minor Child (Iowa Ct. App. 2020).
“See Iowa Code § 232.53 (3).3 J.H. next argues the juvenile court’s early waivers of the sex offender registration requirement were “analogous to an acquittal,” rendering later imposition of the requirement a violation of his “right to be free from double jeopardy.”
— Iowa Code § 232.53(4) — 2 cases
J.S.X. Through D.S.X. v. Foxhoven, 361 F. Supp. 3d 822 (S.D. Iowa 2019).
“CONCLUSION For the foregoing reason, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, [ECF No. 148], is GRANTED as to Count II. It is DENIED as to all other counts.”
State of Iowa v. Dagger Le Erdman (Iowa Ct. App. 2023).
“But the child’s counsel pointed out that under section 232.53(2), “[d]ispositional orders entered subsequent to the child attaining the age of seventeen years and prior to the child’s eighteenth birthday shall automatically terminate one year and six months after the date of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.