Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 232.74 (2026)

Evidence not privileged or excluded

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 622.9 and 622.10 and any other statute or rule of evidence which excludes or makes privileged the testimony of a husband or wife against the other or the testimony of a health practitioner or mental health professional as to confidential communications, do not apply to evidence regarding a child’s injuries or the cause of the injuries in any judicial proceeding, civil or criminal, resulting from a report pursuant to this chapter or relating to the subject matter of such a report. [C66, 71, 73, 75, 77, §235A.8; C79, 81, §232.74] 83 Acts, ch 37, §1; 87 Acts, ch 153, §6 Referred to in §228.6, 232.68

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1981–2025 · leading case: State v. Anderson, 636 N.W.2d 26 (Iowa 2001).
State v. Anderson, 636 N.W.2d 26 (Iowa 2001). · cites it 29× “4 Iowa Code § 232.74 . It provides: *32 Sections 622.”
In the Interest of A.M., Minor Child. Heather Thomas, Subpoenaed Witness, 856 N.W.2d 365 (Iowa 2014). · cites it 11× “2d at 31-32 (describing a similar provision in section 232.74 as an “exception” to the marital privilege codified in section 622.”
State v. Johnson, 318 N.W.2d 417 (Iowa 1982). · cites it 10× “9 was inapplicable by virtue of section 232.74, The Code (emphasis added): Sections 622.”
State of Iowa v. Spaulding, 313 N.W.2d 878 (Iowa 1981). · cites it 12× “Section 232.74 provides: Sections 622.7, 622.”
United States v. Banks, 556 F.3d 967 (9th Cir. 2009). · cites it 6× “2d 553 (Iowa 1997), the Iowa Supreme Court held that Iowa Code § 232.74 , which prohibited the disclosure of communications between married persons, did not apply in a child abuse prosecution.”
State v. Hastings, 466 N.W.2d 697 (Iowa Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “Iowa Code § 232.74 ; State v. Johnson, 318 N.”
State v. Countryman, 572 N.W.2d 553 (Iowa 1997). · cites it 2× “Iowa Code § 232.74 ; State v. Johnson, 318 N.”
State v. Klindt, 389 N.W.2d 670 (Iowa 1986). · cites it 2× “See Iowa Code § 232.74 ). While the State cites two Iowa cases in support of its contention that a criminal-prosecution exception should be imposed, neither is directly on point.”
Commonwealth v. Hunter, 60 A.3d 156 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013). “§ 13-90-107 (2012) (Colorado); Iowa Code § 232.74 (2012) (Iowa); Ken. R.”
State of Iowa v. Joshua G. Chapalonis (Iowa Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 8× “The State asserts the legislature “eliminated the privilege for mandatory reports” under section 232.74. But Smith was not a mandatory reporter of child abuse when counseling Chapalonis.”
State v. Bleeker, 327 N.W.2d 728 (Iowa 1982). · cites it 4× “Iowa Code § 232.74 (1981). Child abuse is broadly defined.”
State of Iowa v. Lynn Melvin Lindaman (Iowa 2025). · cites it 4× “Iowa Code section 232.74 thus establishes a statutory exception to the privilege for testimony “regarding a child’s injuries or the cause of the injuries in any judicial proceeding, civil or criminal, resulting from a report pursuant to [chapter 232] or relating to the subject…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.