Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 252C.4 (2026)

Certification to court — hearing — default

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. A responsible person or child support services may request a hearing regarding a determination of support. If a timely written request for a hearing is received, the department shall certify the matter to the district court as follows:

a. If the child or children reside in Iowa, and child support services is seeking an accruing obligation, in the county in which the dependent child or children reside.

b. If the child or children received public assistance in Iowa, and child support services is seeking only an accrued obligation, in the county in which the dependent child or children last received public assistance.

c. If the action is the result of a request from another state or foreign country to establish\n\nTue Dec 09 22:19:48 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 252C (24, 0) §252C.4, CHILD SUPPORT DEBTS — ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES 4\n\nsupport by a responsible person located in Iowa, in the county in which the responsible person resides.

2. The certification shall include true copies of the notice and finding of financial responsibility or notice of the support debt accrued and accruing, the return of service, the written objections and request for hearing, and true copies of any administrative orders previously entered.

3. The court shall set the matter for hearing and notify the parties of the time and place of hearing.

4. The court shall establish the monthly child support payment and the amount of the support debt accrued and accruing pursuant to section 598.21B, or medical support pursuant to chapter 252E, or both.

5. If a party fails to appear at the hearing, upon a showing of proper notice to that party, the court shall find that party in default and enter an appropriate order.

6. Actions initiated by the department under this chapter are not subject to chapter 17A and resulting court hearings following certification shall be an original hearing before the district court.

7. If a responsible person contests an action initiated under this chapter by denying paternity, the following shall apply, as necessary:

a. (1) If paternity has been legally established by one of the methods enumerated in section 252A.3, subsection 10, or by operation of law due to the established father’s marriage to the mother at the time of conception, birth, or at any time during the period between conception and birth of the child, the provisions of section 600B.41A are applicable.

(2) If the court determines that the prior determination of paternity should not be overcome pursuant to section 600B.41A, and that the responsible person has a duty to provide support, the court shall enter an order establishing the monthly child support payment and the amount of the support debt accrued and accruing pursuant to section 598.21B, or medical support pursuant to chapter 252E, or both.

b. Notwithstanding paragraph “a”, subparagraph (1), if the prior determination of paternity is based on an administrative or court order or other means, pursuant to the laws of another state or foreign country, an action to overcome the prior determination of paternity shall be filed in that jurisdiction. Unless the responsible person requests and is granted a stay of an action initiated under this chapter to establish child or medical support, the action shall proceed as otherwise provided by this chapter. 84 Acts, ch 1278, §4; 89 Acts, ch 166, §5; 89 Acts, ch 179, §1; 90 Acts, ch 1224, §22; 92 Acts, ch 1195, §204; 93 Acts, ch 78, §9; 94 Acts, ch 1171, §21, 22; 95 Acts, ch 67, §19; 2005 Acts, ch 69, §15, 16; 2015 Acts, ch 110, §90, 91; 2023 Acts, ch 19, §875; 2023 Acts, ch 123, §6, 7 Referred to in §252C.5, 598.21B \n

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: Remer v. Bd. of Med. Examiners of the State, 576 N.W.2d 598 (Iowa 1998).
Remer v. Bd. of Med. Examiners of the State, 576 N.W.2d 598 (Iowa 1998). · cites it 8× “In Krause , the court considered whether the hearing afforded to child support obligors under Iowa Code section 252C.4 regarding the level of child support the obligor must pay is a judicial review of agency action or an original hearing in district court.”
Krause v. State Ex Rel. Iowa Dhs, 426 N.W.2d 161 (Iowa 1988). · cites it 14× “Iowa Code § 252C.4 (1985) (emphasis added).”
State Ex Rel. Lara v. Lara, 495 N.W.2d 719 (Iowa 1993). · cites it 4× “Iowa Code § 252C.4(1). After hearing, the district court entered a decree ordering Jamie to pay child support to DHS in the amount of $239.”
Krause v. State ex rel. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 426 N.W.2d 161 (Iowa 1988). · cites it 12× “Iowa Code § 252C.4 (1985) (emphasis added).”
State Ex Rel. Heidick v. Balch, 533 N.W.2d 209 (Iowa 1995). · cites it 6× “See Iowa Code § 252C.4(1). The district court set the matter for hearing.”
Off. of Child Support Ex Rel. Lewis v. Lewis, 2004 VT 127 (Vt. 2004). “Iowa Code § 252C.4(4); Iowa Admin. Code §441-99.”
State of Iowa, Ex Rel., T.J.M., Minor Child v. Christopher J. Peterson v. Mandy M. Heithoff (Iowa Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “On January 23, 2015, the CSRU sought to increase Christopher’s child support obligation to $476 per month, and Christopher requested a hearing pursuant to Iowa Code section 252C.4(1) (2015). Prior to the hearing, both Christopher and Mandy stated they wanted to be responsible to…”
Derek Stanfield v. State of Iowa Dep't of Pub. Def. (Iowa Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “, Iowa Code §§ 252C.4(6) (“Actions initiated by the department under this chapter are not subject to chapter 17A .”
— Iowa Code § 252C.4(1) — 5 cases
State Ex Rel. Lara v. Lara, 495 N.W.2d 719 (Iowa 1993). “Iowa Code § 252C.4(1). After hearing, the district court entered a decree ordering Jamie to pay child support to DHS in the amount of $239.”
State Ex Rel. Heidick v. Balch, 533 N.W.2d 209 (Iowa 1995). “See Iowa Code § 252C.4(1). The district court set the matter for hearing.”
Krause v. State Ex Rel. Iowa Dhs, 426 N.W.2d 161 (Iowa 1988). “Iowa Code § 252C.4 (1985) (emphasis added).”
Krause v. State ex rel. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 426 N.W.2d 161 (Iowa 1988). “Iowa Code § 252C.4 (1985) (emphasis added).”
State of Iowa, Ex Rel., T.J.M., Minor Child v. Christopher J. Peterson v. Mandy M. Heithoff (Iowa Ct. App. 2016). “On January 23, 2015, the CSRU sought to increase Christopher’s child support obligation to $476 per month, and Christopher requested a hearing pursuant to Iowa Code section 252C.4(1) (2015). Prior to the hearing, both Christopher and Mandy stated they wanted to be responsible to…”
— Iowa Code § 252C.4(3) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Heidick v. Balch, 533 N.W.2d 209 (Iowa 1995). “See Iowa Code § 252C.4(1). The district court set the matter for hearing.”
— Iowa Code § 252C.4(4) — 5 cases
Off. of Child Support Ex Rel. Lewis v. Lewis, 2004 VT 127 (Vt. 2004). “Iowa Code § 252C.4(4); Iowa Admin. Code §441-99.”
State Ex Rel. Lara v. Lara, 495 N.W.2d 719 (Iowa 1993). “Iowa Code § 252C.4(1). After hearing, the district court entered a decree ordering Jamie to pay child support to DHS in the amount of $239.”
State Ex Rel. Heidick v. Balch, 533 N.W.2d 209 (Iowa 1995). “See Iowa Code § 252C.4(1). The district court set the matter for hearing.”
Krause v. State Ex Rel. Iowa Dhs, 426 N.W.2d 161 (Iowa 1988). “Iowa Code § 252C.4 (1985) (emphasis added).”
Krause v. State ex rel. Iowa Dep't of Human Servs., 426 N.W.2d 161 (Iowa 1988). “Iowa Code § 252C.4 (1985) (emphasis added).”
— Iowa Code § 252C.4(6) — 2 cases
State of Iowa, Ex Rel., T.J.M., Minor Child v. Christopher J. Peterson v. Mandy M. Heithoff (Iowa Ct. App. 2016). “On January 23, 2015, the CSRU sought to increase Christopher’s child support obligation to $476 per month, and Christopher requested a hearing pursuant to Iowa Code section 252C.4(1) (2015). Prior to the hearing, both Christopher and Mandy stated they wanted to be responsible to…”
Derek Stanfield v. State of Iowa Dep't of Pub. Def. (Iowa Ct. App. 2025). “, Iowa Code §§ 252C.4(6) (“Actions initiated by the department under this chapter are not subject to chapter 17A .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.