Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 279.46 (2026)

Retirement incentives — tax

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The board of directors of a school district may adopt a program for payment of a monetary bonus, continuation of health or medical insurance coverage, or other incentives for encouraging its employees to retire before the normal retirement date as defined in chapter 97B. The program is available only to employees who notify the board of directors prior to April 1 of the fiscal year that they intend to retire not later than the start of the next following school calendar. The age at which employees shall be designated eligible for the program shall be at the discretion of the board. An employee retiring under this section may apply for a retirement allowance under chapter 97B or chapter 294. The board may include in the district management levy an amount to pay the total estimated accumulated cost to the school district of the health or medical insurance coverage, bonus, or other incentives for employees fifty-five years of age or older who retire under this section. 87 Acts, ch 224, §51; 89 Acts, ch 135, §75; 92 Acts, ch 1220, §1; 98 Acts, ch 1216, §27, 43; 2002 Acts, ch 1152, §6; 2003 Acts, ch 180, §33; 2014 Acts, ch 1052, §1 – 3 Referred to in §298.4\n\nTue Dec 09 22:17:58 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 279 (98, 4) 25 DIRECTORS — POWERS AND DUTIES, §279.49

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: Weddum v. Davenport Cmty. Sch. Dist., 750 N.W.2d 114 (Iowa 2008).
Weddum v. Davenport Cmty. Sch. Dist., 750 N.W.2d 114 (Iowa 2008). · cites it 6× “See Iowa Code § 279.46 . This funding avenue for the incentives frees up more money in the school districts’ general funds for other needs.”
Kathy Weddum Vs. Davenport Cmty. Sch. Dist. (Iowa 2008). · cites it 6× “See Iowa Code § 279.46 . This funding avenue for the incentives frees up more money in the school districts’ general funds for other needs.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.