Iowa Code » Chapter 290 — APPEAL FROM DECISIONS OF BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 290.2 (2026)

Notice — transcript — hearing

✓ Iowa Code 2026 (laws through the 2025 session)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The state board of education shall, within five days after the filing of such affidavit, notify the secretary of the proper school corporation in writing of the taking of such appeal, who shall, within ten days after being thus notified, file with the state board a complete certified transcript of the record and proceedings relating to the decision appealed from. Thereupon, the state board shall notify in writing all persons adversely interested of the time when and place where the matter of appeal will be heard. [R60, §2136, 2137; C73, §1832 – 1834; C97, §2819; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §4299; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §290.2]

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1979–1986 · leading case: Bishop v. Iowa State Bd. of Pub. Instruction, 395 N.W.2d 888 (Iowa 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bishop v. Iowa State Bd. of Pub. Instruction, 395 N.W.2d 888 (Iowa 1986). · cites it 4× “Iowa Code § 290.2 . A panel of the BPI conducted a hearing on the appeal.”
Buchholtz v. Iowa Dep't of Pub. Instruction, 315 N.W.2d 789 (Iowa 1982). · cites it 2× “After the Rockwell-Swaledale school board denied petitioner’s alternative requests, he pursued an appeal to the state board of public instruction under section 290.2, The Code. After hearing, the board affirmed the district’s decision.”
State v. Williams, 285 N.W.2d 248 (Iowa 1979). “See also Model Code of Pre-Arraignment Procedure § 290.2(5) (Proposed Official Draft, 1975) (proposing a codified version of the rule).”
Iowa Code § 290.2(5): 1 case
State v. Williams, 285 N.W.2d 248 (Iowa 1979). “See also Model Code of Pre-Arraignment Procedure § 290.2(5) (Proposed Official Draft, 1975) (proposing a codified version of the rule).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.