Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 306.12 (2026)

Notice — service

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Notice of the hearing under section 306.11 shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the county or counties where the road is located, not less than four nor more than twenty days prior to the date of hearing. The agency which is holding the hearing shall notify all adjoining property owners, all utility companies whose facilities adjoin the road right-of-way or are on the road right-of-way, and the department, boards of supervisors, or agency in control of affected state lands, of the time and place of the hearing, by certified mail. [SS15, §1527-r7; C24, 27, §4621; C31, 35, §4621, 4755-d4; C39, §4621, 4755.39; C46, 50, §306.62, 313.48; C54, 58, 62, 66, §306.6; C71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §306.12] 92 Acts, ch 1049, §1; 94 Acts, ch 1013, §1; 95 Acts, ch 54, §1; 2000 Acts, ch 1074, §2 Referred to in §306A.6

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1979–2014 · leading case: Den Hartog v. City of Waterloo, 847 N.W.2d 459 (Iowa 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Den Hartog v. City of Waterloo, 847 N.W.2d 459 (Iowa 2014). · cites it 3× “Compare Iowa Code § 306.12 (granting hearing rights regarding vacation and closing of roadway to “adjoining property owners,” adjoining utility companies, and county boards of supervisors in control of the tract), with id.”

Miller v. Warren Cnty., 285 N.W.2d 190 (Iowa 1979). · cites it 4× “Section 306.12 provided for notice of a proposed road closing to be published at least twenty days prior to the hearing.”

Tunis E. Den Hartog, Shirley Ann Schweertman, Leonard G. Lybbert, James Edward Schuman, Michael J. Mac, Mary Ellen Molinaro, William James Robert, & Mark D. Fisher v. City of Waterloo (Iowa 2014). · cites it 3× “Compare Iowa Code § 306.12 (granting hearing rights regarding vacation and closing of roadway to “adjoining property owners,” adjoining utility companies, and county 9 boards of supervisors in control of the tract), with id.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.