Iowa Code » Chapter 306A — CONTROLLED-ACCESS HIGHWAYS
Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 306A.7 (2026)

Authority of local units to consent

✓ Iowa Code 2026 (laws through the 2025 session)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Cities and highway authorities having jurisdiction and control over the highways of the state, as provided by chapter 306 are authorized to enter into agreements with each other, or with the federal government, respecting the financing, planning, establishment, improvement, maintenance, use, regulation, or vacation of controlled-access facilities or other public ways in their respective jurisdictions, to facilitate the purposes of this chapter. [C58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §306A.7]

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1958–1971 · leading case: Warren v. Iowa State High. Comm'n, 93 N.W.2d 60 (Iowa 1958).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Warren v. Iowa State High. Comm'n, 93 N.W.2d 60 (Iowa 1958). · cites it 2× “The plaintiff urges that section 306A.7 provides that authorities having jurisdiction -and control over the highways of the State, as provided by chapter 306, may enter into agreements with each other or with the Federal Government “respecting the financing, planning,…”
Iowa Power & Light Co. v. Iowa State High. Comm'n, 117 N.W.2d 425 (Iowa 1962). · cites it 2× “Section 306A.7 of chapter 306A gives the highway authorities the right to enter into agreements with the Federal Government respecting the “* * * planning, establishment, improvement, maintenance, use, regulation, or vacation” of eontrolled-access facilities.”
Halweg v. City of Sioux City, 189 N.W.2d 623 (Iowa 1971). “3, Code, 1971, which relevantly provides: “Cities, towns, and highway authorities * * * acting alone or in co-operation with each other * * * are hereby authorized to plan, designate, establish, regulate, vacate, alter, improve, maintain and provide controlled-access facilities…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.